On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 07:12:02PM +0200, Erik Brangs wrote:
> (Non-)Atomicity of access to 32 bit or 64 bit memory words, memory barriers
> and implemented floating point instructions.
Well for testing the code is right for that stuff, power7 and power8
are the best. They are extremely picky an
Hi,
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Erik Brangs wrote:
> On 26.10.2016 17:57, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > what hardware details are actually important for you?
>
> (Non-)Atomicity of access to 32 bit or 64 bit memory words, memory
> barriers and implemented floating point instructions.
>
> There's an existing ba
Hi,
On 26.10.2016 17:57, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> what hardware details are actually important for you?
(Non-)Atomicity of access to 32 bit or 64 bit memory words, memory barriers and
implemented floating point instructions.
There's an existing backend that I'd like to refactor and possibly improve
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 06:49:36PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Freescale/NXP e500mc based SoCs like P2041 or P4080.
Oh yeah. Of course.
--
Len Sorensen
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 08:08:29PM +0200, Erik Brangs wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Erik,
> Thanks for the hints, but those machines use 64-bit processors or 32-bit
> processors with SPE. I would need a 32-bit PPC with FPU, preferably with
> multiple cores. The projects that I'm interested in are related to
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 04:50:43PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 08:32:23PM +0200, Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR) wrote:
> > 64bit PPCs should be compatible with 32bit user space with most operating
> > systems. So unless you specifically target kernel space and MMU code, yo
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 05:16:16AM +, luigi burdo wrote:
> talos-secure-workstation
> prize $4000 + taxes the mobo without cpu
> with 4 core power 8 and gpu prize will be $18.000
> not for my poket ... happy you will have this extras
I wish. :)
I didn't noticve the $7500 complete desktop syst
7 matches
Mail list logo
