Re: ppc64el netinst will not boot

2016-06-05 Thread Herminio Hernandez Jr.
I agree. Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 5, 2016, at 7:44 PM, Programmingkid wrote: > > >> On Jun 5, 2016, at 10:35 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 05:40:10PM -0400, Programmingkid wrote: On Jun 3, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Herminio Hernandez Jr. wrote: I have

Re: ppc64el netinst will not boot

2016-06-05 Thread Programmingkid
On Jun 5, 2016, at 10:35 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 05:40:10PM -0400, Programmingkid wrote: >> On Jun 3, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Herminio Hernandez Jr. wrote: >> >>> I have a PowerMac G5 and I tried to load the 64el iso and it will not boot. >>> Has anyone had similar issue

Re: ppc64el netinst will not boot

2016-06-05 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 05:40:10PM -0400, Programmingkid wrote: > On Jun 3, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Herminio Hernandez Jr. wrote: > > > I have a PowerMac G5 and I tried to load the 64el iso and it will not boot. > > Has anyone had similar issues? > > Yes. I tried installing it on my iMac G5 and it wou

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-05 Thread Niels Thykier
Steven Chamberlain: > Hi, > Hi, > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> I have invested lots of time and effort to get sparc64 into a usable state >> in Debian. >> We are close to 11.000 installed packages. Missing packages include Firefox, >> Thunderbird/Icedove, golang and LibreOffice to name t

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-05 Thread Oleg Endo
Hi, On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 13:26 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > sh4: > > > The two biggest issues with sh4 are currently with binutils and the > kernel. binutils has problems when building Qt5: > There is in fact another big elephant in the room, which I have mentioned several tim

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-05 Thread Holger Levsen
thanks to everyone explaining arch:any to me :) -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-05 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > I have invested lots of time and effort to get sparc64 into a usable state in > Debian. > We are close to 11.000 installed packages. Missing packages include Firefox, > Thunderbird/Icedove, golang and LibreOffice to name the most important ones. Is there so

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-05 Thread Niels Thykier
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: > Hi Niels! > > On 06/05/2016 12:01 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: >> Beyond mips64el, we are not aware of any new architectures for Stretch. >> >> I kindly ask you to: >> >> * Porters, please assert if your architecture is targeting Stretch. > > To give some insight what's

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-05 Thread peter green
On 05/06/16 13:00, Holger Levsen wrote: On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:26:39PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: ppc64: This architecture is basically on par with the release architectures. We have over 11.000 packages installed [...] sparc64: We are close to 11.000 installed

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-05 Thread Christian Seiler
On 06/05/2016 02:00 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:26:39PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> ppc64: >> >> This architecture is basically on par with the release architectures. We >> have over >> 11.000 packages installed > [...] >> sparc64: >> We are close to 11.000

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-05 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 06/05/2016 02:00 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > I'm not sure whether you are talking about source or binary packages but > sid/amd64 has over 24000 source packages and over 5 binary packages, > so I would call the above "on par". Or what am I missing? There are just around 12,000 source package

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-05 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:26:39PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > ppc64: > > This architecture is basically on par with the release architectures. We have > over > 11.000 packages installed [...] > sparc64: > We are close to 11.000 installed packages. I'm not sure whether you are tal

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-05 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Niels! On 06/05/2016 12:01 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > Beyond mips64el, we are not aware of any new architectures for Stretch. > > I kindly ask you to: > > * Porters, please assert if your architecture is targeting Stretch. To give some insight what's happening in Debian Ports. We have two c

[Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-05 Thread Niels Thykier
Hi members of DSA, Security, RT and all porters. While the freeze still seem far away, I think it is time to start with the architecture qualifications. For starters, here are the architectures we are aware of: * amd64, i386, armel, armhf, arm64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x - *N