Re: Bug#749743: qt4-x11: use ppc64el in no_pch_architectures to fix FTBFS on ppc64el

2014-08-23 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Sunday 24 August 2014 01:34:08 William Grant wrote: [snip] > That seems like it would be easier for everyone, but let me know if you > can't for some reason and I'll do it. That would be -- I still maintain the point that designing a monolithic

Re: Bug#749743: qt4-x11: use ppc64el in no_pch_architectures to fix FTBFS on ppc64el

2014-08-23 Thread William Grant
On 24/08/14 01:23, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > On Saturday 23 August 2014 10:54:48 William Grant wrote: > [snip] >> >> I'm the author of >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/159898800/qt4-x11_4%3A4.8.4%2Bdfsg-0ubuntu20_4 >> %3A4.8.4%2Bdfsg-0ubuntu21.diff.gz. I don't know where the '*64

Re: Bug#749743: qt4-x11: use ppc64el in no_pch_architectures to fix FTBFS on ppc64el

2014-08-23 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Saturday 23 August 2014 10:54:48 William Grant wrote: [snip] > > I'm the author of > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/159898800/qt4-x11_4%3A4.8.4%2Bdfsg-0ubuntu20_4 > %3A4.8.4%2Bdfsg-0ubuntu21.diff.gz. I don't know where the '*64*' bits in the > attachments here came from. > > I'm waiting for the

Re: failed ppc64el build of ruby-ffi 1.9.3debian-2

2014-08-23 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hello *, [not subscribed to debian-powerpc@l.d.o, please keep me in Cc:] On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:30:02PM +, Debian buildds wrote: > * Source package: ruby-ffi > * Version: 1.9.3debian-2 > * Architecture: ppc64el > * State: failed > * Suite: sid > * Builder: ppc64el1.debian.net > * B

Re: Bug#749743: qt4-x11: use ppc64el in no_pch_architectures to fix FTBFS on ppc64el

2014-08-23 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi William, Thanks for the quick reply :) On 08/22/2014 09:54 PM, William Grant wrote: I'm the author of http://launchpadlibrarian.net/159898800/qt4-x11_4%3A4.8.4%2Bdfsg-0ubuntu20_4%3A4.8.4%2Bdfsg-0ubuntu21.diff.gz. I don't know where the '*64*' bits in the attachments here came from. AFAICT,