Re: Bug in gcc for powerpc?

2012-07-28 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 04:45:35PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> Hi gcc and powerpc teams, >> >> Supercollider recently failed to build in powerpc[1] with some weird >> errors about operand out of range. Googling around suggests working >> ar

Re: Bug in gcc for powerpc?

2012-07-28 Thread Roger Leigh
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 04:45:35PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Hi gcc and powerpc teams, > > Supercollider recently failed to build in powerpc[1] with some weird > errors about operand out of range. Googling around suggests working > around the problem by avoiding inlining. And in fact, SC buil

Re: Bug in gcc for powerpc?

2012-07-28 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Hi gcc and powerpc teams, > > Supercollider recently failed to build in powerpc[1] with some weird > errors about operand out of range. Googling around suggests working > around the problem by avoiding inlining. And in fact, SC builds after

Re: Bug in gcc for powerpc?

2012-07-28 Thread Roger Leigh
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 04:45:35PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Hi gcc and powerpc teams, > > Supercollider recently failed to build in powerpc[1] with some weird > errors about operand out of range. Googling around suggests working > around the problem by avoiding inlining. And in fact, SC buil

Bug in gcc for powerpc?

2012-07-28 Thread Felipe Sateler
Hi gcc and powerpc teams, Supercollider recently failed to build in powerpc[1] with some weird errors about operand out of range. Googling around suggests working around the problem by avoiding inlining. And in fact, SC builds after avoiding inlining one function. However, it seems to me this is a

Re: Bug#664547: spatialite: FTBFS on some archs (test failures)

2012-07-28 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 01:54:50PM +0100, peter green wrote: > 01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789 > >Current version 3.1.0~rc2-1 seems ok on all archs, but for ppc > >where it fails to build with something that looks like a compiler > >issue. > Based on

Re: Bug#664547: spatialite: FTBFS on some archs (test failures)

2012-07-28 Thread peter green
01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789 Current version 3.1.0~rc2-1 seems ok on all archs, but for ppc where it fails to build with something that looks like a compiler issue. Based on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spatialite/+bug/1012976 and