Re: GCC bug 44606 (was Re: Debian powerpc binary compatibility)?

2010-09-21 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Sergei Poselenov | 2010-09-21 14:54:22 [+0400]: >Hello Sebastian, Hi Sergei, >Should the bug 44606 trigger on a e500v1 CPU? > >I can check it with gcc 4.2.2 on a MPC8560 system. SPE support got merged in gcc 4.3. An e500v1 CPU does not have support for the type "double" so you shouldn't be able

Re: Debian powerpc binary compatibility?

2010-09-21 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Sergei Poselenov | 2010-09-21 14:09:24 [+0400]: >Hello Sebastian, Hi Sergei, >BTW, do you know - why the separate target for e500? Is the instruction >set for e500 so fundamentally different it needs a special configuration >for GCC? Why GCC cannot switch codegeneration at run-time, conditionin

Re: Re: Taking over maintainance of yaboot ?

2010-09-21 Thread zsombibi
I promised some details about my hardware. So I can participate to testing with a Power5 pSeries CHRP IBM 9113-550, an U320 raid controller (ibm5709) in it. Actually, I'm playing with the installation of the weekly build. I also have some older hardware but i dont think anyone is interested in

GCC bug 44606 (was Re: Debian powerpc binary compatibility)?

2010-09-21 Thread Sergei Poselenov
Hello Sebastian, Should the bug 44606 trigger on a e500v1 CPU? I can check it with gcc 4.2.2 on a MPC8560 system. Regards, Sergei -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://l

Re: Debian powerpc binary compatibility?

2010-09-21 Thread Sergei Poselenov
Hello Sebastian, On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 22:35:27 +0200 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Sergei Poselenov | 2010-09-18 11:44:01 [+0400]: > > > >Thanks, but I'm looking for specific information - what instruction > >set was used by gcc to build Debian binaries. > > > >It seems to me this infor