Dear Rick
Rick Thomas wrote:
>> gnome: Depends: tomboy (>= 1.0) but it is not installable
I think that is answered in the Thread "Problems with Debian PowerPC" by
Rick Thomas of 12/16/2009 09:23 PM.
Regards, Adrian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 18 December 2009, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> While I did not take care about the fallout due to time constraints on
>> my side, I did take a look at the meta-gnome2 migration back then. We
>> did not place any approval hint but it seems that the multiple arch:all
>> confus
I understand "normal churn" in testing and unstable, but these
problems have persisted for over a week.
Attached is the log of an attempt to do "aptitude full-upgrade" on my
Debian Squeeze PowerPC test machine.
Here's the part that first indicates there might be trouble...
The following p
On Friday 18 December 2009, Philipp Kern wrote:
> While I did not take care about the fallout due to time constraints on
> my side, I did take a look at the meta-gnome2 migration back then. We
> did not place any approval hint but it seems that the multiple arch:all
> confused britney sufficiently
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 09:04:19AM -0700, Thomas Carlson wrote:
> Still no sound. Any suggestions
Have you checked that the sound channels are not muted? I remember
having to enable manually some of them with alsamixer.
Best regards,
Cédric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc
First I tried...
sudo modprobe snd_powermac
No luck.
Then I added snd-powermac to the /etc/modules file
Still no sound. Any suggestions
Tom
On Dec 17, 2009, at 11:07 PM, Risto Suominen wrote:
> 2009/12/17, Gombang Nan Cengka :
>> On Thursday 17 December 2009 22:35:56 Thomas Carlson wrote:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everybody,
I have just received a 520 server with a power6 in. I'am trying to
install from a daily netinst iso. I can boot using install64 (need two
call to install64) but it don't detect any network board, which is a
little problematic :)
It seem
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 02:49:47PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > It's almost certain that both the relevant package maintainer and the
> > release team are already aware of this and that it has been a conscious
> > choice to accept the breakage.
> Given that the package version clearly indicat
8 matches
Mail list logo