Le Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 05:32:26PM +0200, Michel Dänzer a écrit :
> On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 11:53 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >
> > The result is that on some particular types of computations, the G5
> > performs extremely bad: something like twice slower as an old 1.5 Ghz
> > Celeron machine. Fo
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 17:56 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 05:32:26PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 11:53 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > >
> > > The result is that on some particular types of computations, the G5
> > > performs extremely bad: someth
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 05:32:26PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 11:53 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >
> > The result is that on some particular types of computations, the G5
> > performs extremely bad: something like twice slower as an old 1.5 Ghz
> > Celeron machine. For s
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 11:53 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> The result is that on some particular types of computations, the G5
> performs extremely bad: something like twice slower as an old 1.5 Ghz
> Celeron machine. For some other tests, the performances of the
> processors scale with the freq
People,
I finally found some time to give Lenny a run on my Xserve-G5 (Dual
2GHz, Cluster Node version).
Just for the record, installing Debian (or anything non-MacOSX) on
this box is not exactly easy, as there is no optical drive and no way
to boot it reliably over the network.
I ended-up writi
5 matches
Mail list logo
