On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 03:50:38AM +0200, Christian Jaeger wrote:
> So I guess I'm back at using MOL under a linux/ppc (since MOL didn't
> require these driver partitions, and didn't have any issue loading the
> Mac OS 9).
I just tried it, and I couldn't get OS9 to run under qemu even
with the o
Christian Jaeger wrote:
So I guess I'm back at using MOL under a linux/ppc (since MOL didn't
require these driver partitions, and didn't have any issue loading the
Mac OS 9).
Still out of luck:
# create a file named "lenny" of 3.5G size (mksparse is a script of mine)
$ mksparse 3.5G lenny
#
Brad Boyer wrote:
Weren't you trying to run OS9? This is definitely OSX, as the classic
MacOS didn't use mach for its kernel.
Hm, strange, I wasn't aware that any OS X stuff was on that partition as
well. And when booting that partition through MOL it definitely booted
OS 9 (but iirc one c
Hi
We have an embedded custom board PowerPC board (Freescale).
I have booted Debian 3.1 (Sarge) on the system running on Linux kernel
2.6.23.
I have an ATI graphic card Radeon 9250 PCI card.
I would like to run flash application on the graphic card to do
performance testing on the flash performa
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 07:31:41PM +0200, Christian Jaeger wrote:
> With mac99 it goes further (shows graphical output for a moment, then
> back to a text screen, with messages "Unresolved kernel trap(cpu 0):
> 0x700 Program DSISR=0x4200 DAR=... generating stack backtrace prior
> to panic ..
Brad Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 06:46:43PM +0200, Christian Jaeger wrote:
$ qemu-system-ppc -M \?
Supported machines are:
g3bw Heathrow based PowerMAC (default)
mac99 Mac99 based PowerMAC
prep PowerPC PREP platform
ref405ep ref405ep
taihu taihu
Using -M prep
I have a 7600/120 and 7600/132 that I was using as gateway/firewall
machines for several years, but have now retired. They have a basic
Debian-only install, booting via quik. If someone can use them to
continue support for Debian on PowerPC, I'm happy to give them away
(you pay shipping).
IMO th
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 06:46:43PM +0200, Christian Jaeger wrote:
> $ qemu-system-ppc -M \?
> Supported machines are:
> g3bw Heathrow based PowerMAC (default)
> mac99 Mac99 based PowerMAC
> prep PowerPC PREP platform
> ref405ep ref405ep
> taihu taihu
>
> Using -M prep shows
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
I didn't try running MacOS, but my (Ubuntu's) qemu has:
| $ qemu-system-ppc -M ?
| Supported machines are:
| g3bw Heathrow based PowerMAC (default)
| mac99 Mac99 based PowerMAC
| prep PowerPC PREP platform
| ref405ep ref405ep
| taihu taihu
T
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 04:36:44PM +0200, Christian Jaeger wrote:
> Basilisk II won't run Mac OS 9, from what I read.
As far as I know, Basilisk II is an m68k Mac emulator rather than ppc. It
sounds like the application needed is ppc native.
Brad Boyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To U
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Christian Jaeger wrote:
> J�r�me Warnier wrote:
> > Just install Mac OS 9 directly under your qemu VM.
>
> Really? Doesn't qemu only emulate PC hardware (except for the cpu)? For linux
> that shouldn't matter as you could presumably compile the PC hardware drivers
> into a ppc
Adrian Zaugg wrote:
Hi Christian
You may run pearpc and mol,
You mean running a linux system inside pearpc and from there run MOL
(the same way I suggested with qemu)? Would you recommend pearpc over
qemu for that purpose?
SheepShaver or Basilisk II.
Basilisk II won't run Mac OS 9, fro
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
Christian Jaeger wrote:
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
Just my .2c: Both applications also exist for Windows, and probably
run nicely under WINE.
Yes, I've thought about this, too, but I'd have to get a copy of
those apps only for the purpose of the conversion; also I was still
Christian Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> (c) PearPC
> http://pearpc.sourceforge.net/faq.html says "Can I run Mac OS 9.x.y?
> So far no one has succeeded in doing that. Have a look at the forums."
> and I didn't find something relevant in the forums when I looked.
Hmm I'm pretty sure I saw
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
Just my .2c: Both applications also exist for Windows, and probably
run nicely under WINE.
Yes, I've thought about this, too, but I'd have to get a copy of those
apps only for the purpose of the conversion; also I was still using
FileMaker 4. Also there might be further
Julien BLACHE wrote:
(c) PearPC
http://pearpc.sourceforge.net/faq.html says "Can I run Mac OS 9.x.y? So
far no one has succeeded in doing that. Have a look at the forums." and
I didn't find something relevant in the forums when I looked.
Christian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
Christian Jaeger wrote:
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
Just my .2c: Both applications also exist for Windows, and probably
run nicely under WINE.
Yes, I've thought about this, too, but I'd have to get a copy of those
apps only for the purpose of the conversion; also I was still using
FileMaker 4. Als
Hi Christian
You may run pearpc and mol, SheepShaver or Basilisk II. You can get more
info from
http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20060509180914879&lsrc=osxh
about the latter two.
Easiest would be to get an old mac from someone...
Best Regards, Adrian.
Christian Jaeger wrote:
Christian Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What are you using for running Mac OS 9 (*) on a x86-64 machine? It
> seems there are only two ways:
> (a) running a ppc linux kernel with MOL under QEMU, run Mac OS inside MOL.
> (b) running SheepShaver
(c) PearPC
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian &
Christian Jaeger wrote:
Hello
What are you using for running Mac OS 9 (*) on a x86-64 machine? It
seems there are only two ways:
(a) running a ppc linux kernel with MOL under QEMU, run Mac OS inside MOL.
(b) running SheepShaver
Any good/bad experiences with either of those or other ways?
(I
20 matches
Mail list logo
