On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 20:43 +0100, Rob Andrews wrote:
> On 08-Jun-2007 06:59.13 (BST), Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> > > With 32MB (Radeon 9200)
> > > I had to hack around DRI limits to run Beryl at 1240x1024 and then it
> > > chockes an more than few windows.
> > As I said, I use compiz and not be
On 08-Jun-2007 06:59.13 (BST), Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> > With 32MB (Radeon 9200)
> > I had to hack around DRI limits to run Beryl at 1240x1024 and then it
> > chockes an more than few windows.
> As I said, I use compiz and not beryl. I always had the feeling that
> Beryl was more cpu and gp
Hi.
Maybe you wondered where the mail
'gnat-4.1/gcj-4.1 manual builds needed on [...]'
has been for more than a month.
It was catched by one of our spamfilters, the one that should stop
excessive cross-posting.
So i hope i fixed this now,
Cord, Debian Listmaster of the day
--
http://
While having built and uploaded things correctly for experimental, I
didn't do the same for unstable, which now needs some manual
intervention building gnat-4.1 and gcj-4.1.
gnat-4.1 (mips mipsel s390 sparc):
- work in a sid chroot
- install gnat-4.1-base libgnat-4.1 libgnatprj4.1 libgnatvsn4.1
4 matches
Mail list logo