On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 10:57:22PM +, Jeffrey Rolland wrote:
> /var/log/daemon.log is empty:
>
> computername:/var/log# ls -l | more
>
> -rw-r- 1 rootadm 0 Oct 29 06:47 daemon.log
Are there old ones in the same directory?
/var/log$ ls -l daemon.log*
-rw-r- 1 root adm
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:55:20PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 16:29 +1100, Ian Wienand wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:06:31PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > Or if not ,what is the exact missing bit ? numactl should work on
> > > powerpc and is us
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 17:13 +1100, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:56:09PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Can't you just apply a debian patch fixing the syscall number and do a
> > build with that ? It doesn't need the syscall to work, and as I said, we
> > do use it regul
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:56:09PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Can't you just apply a debian patch fixing the syscall number and do a
> build with that ? It doesn't need the syscall to work, and as I said, we
> do use it regulary, I would be fairly annoyed if it disappeared
> completely
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 16:29 +1100, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:06:31PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Or if not ,what is the exact missing bit ? numactl should work on
> > powerpc and is useful on it. It shouldn't be dropped just bcs there is a
> > temporary build fail
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 16:29 +1100, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:06:31PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Or if not ,what is the exact missing bit ? numactl should work on
> > powerpc and is useful on it. It shouldn't be dropped just bcs there is a
> > temporary build fail
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:06:31PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Or if not ,what is the exact missing bit ? numactl should work on
> powerpc and is useful on it. It shouldn't be dropped just bcs there is a
> temporary build failure.
I wish to drop it for now firstly because (and this is m
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 15:57 +1100, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 03:47:25PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Ugh ? Is there a replacement ? numactl is useful on 64 bits powerpc
> > machines. Or is numactl itself being replaced by something else ?
>
> The latest libnuma depen
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 15:47 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 09:40 +1100, Ian Wienand wrote:
> > Package: ftp.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have dropped Alpha and PowerPC from numactl, as they don't have the
> > kernel support to build the lates
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 03:47:25PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Ugh ? Is there a replacement ? numactl is useful on 64 bits powerpc
> machines. Or is numactl itself being replaced by something else ?
The latest libnuma depends on, in particular, the migrate_pages system
call, which isn't
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 09:40 +1100, Ian Wienand wrote:
> Package: ftp.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> I have dropped Alpha and PowerPC from numactl, as they don't have the
> kernel support to build the latest versions. It's very unlikely
> anyone cares about this package on those archit
Brad Boyer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 02:36:19PM -0600, Jeffrey Rolland wrote:
I am running sarge and installed netatalk from aptitude, so it should
be 2.0.2-3; how can I check this?
Try the following:
dpkg -l netatalk
That will give you a list format with the current version a
On (30/10/06 09:48), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is what I have to work with:
>
> debian-31r3-powerpc-netinst.iso install on a wallstreet:
> old world, sonnet G3 500, 318 meg ram, cdrom, floppy
>
> Turned off journaling on my osx volume and checked and it is says no
> under journaling
> I h
This is what I have to work with:
debian-31r3-powerpc-netinst.iso install on a wallstreet:
old world, sonnet G3 500, 318 meg ram, cdrom, floppy
Turned off journaling on my osx volume and checked and it is says no
under journaling
I have 2 mac partitions:
/dev/hda9 osx hfs+
/dev/hda10 os9 hf
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 02:36:19PM -0600, Jeffrey Rolland wrote:
> I am running sarge and installed netatalk from aptitude, so it should
> be 2.0.2-3; how can I check this?
Try the following:
dpkg -l netatalk
That will give you a list format with the current version and the
short description.
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
I have dropped Alpha and PowerPC from numactl, as they don't have the
kernel support to build the latest versions. It's very unlikely
anyone cares about this package on those architectures.
Could you please remove them from unstable so the package ca
On Oct 29, 2006, at 12:14 AM, Brad Boyer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 01:03:12AM +, Jeffrey Rolland wrote:
Looks like it must be something else.
It must be. It might be worth listing which version you have. I'm
running sarge on my box, and it has version 2.0.2-3 of netatalk. If
you're
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 01:03:12AM +, Jeffrey Rolland wrote:
> I did as you said, and the result was the same:
>
> computername:/etc/netatalk# /etc/init.d/netatalk restart
> Restarting AppleTalk Daemons (this will take a while)Stopping AppleTalk
> Daemons: afpd papd timelord atalkd.
> ..Start
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Am 29.10.2006 um 08:40 schrieb Peter Rooney:
Dear Jeffrey,
Sonnet G3 upgrade in my 7600 (extremely similar) worked fine for both
woody and sarge. After I'd been running it for a year, I discovered
that there was
Thanks for the tip but that kernel panics during the install.
Tried to use the new ram disk and the 2.4 kernel but there was an
issue with the cdrom driver...
Anyone got any other ideas?
Barry
On 2006/10/29, at 6:56, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
By the way, the iso that I used for install was:
Dear Jeffrey,
Sonnet G3 upgrade in my 7600 (extremely similar) worked fine for both woody
and sarge. After I'd been running it for a year, I discovered that there
was a way to get the L2 cache used in Linux. My run book for that machine
is buried, so I can't say for certain what the process
21 matches
Mail list logo
