Re: apt (intentionally?) brain dead?

On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 18:24 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > So far I thought putting a finger to problems might help. Even if I do > that without the soft words of a priest, and in spite of the technical > mistakes I make. But I'm able to learn. Especially if even people like > you don't see any

Re: Orinoco/hermes (original Airport) WPA support status

On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:05:23PM +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: > On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 21:59 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 11:50:56PM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 09:16:10PM +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: > > > > On Wed, 05 Oct 200

Re: How to get rid of sungem at boot time?

Hi Ben Hi All First this: Removing sungem(_phy) at boot time helps getting airport up (more in the test report #1 at the end of this mail) And yes, I believe you, Ben, when you write it's no good to remove these drivers .. :) On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:57:00AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote

Re: apt (intentionally?) brain dead?

On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 03:15:24PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 15:09 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 01:04:59PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 00:13 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > > > > > > Again: Is it brain

Re: Airport Extreme works on linux!

Looks like the folks over at http://linux-bcom4301.sourceforge.net/ are making some progress in this area as well. Check this out. http://bcm43xx.berlios.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: How to get rid of sungem at boot time?

On 10/13/05, Dean Hamstead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > airport isn't (yet) auto-detected by hotplug (soon). When that will > > happen, your airport driver will also be automagically loaded and there > > is no way to know which one will end up eth0 and which one will end up > > eth1. > > this is

Re: apt (intentionally?) brain dead?

On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 15:09 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 01:04:59PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 00:13 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > > > > Again: Is it brain dead software or a feature? > > > > > > Or what did I miss? > > > > Try w

Re: How to get rid of sungem at boot time?

airport isn't (yet) auto-detected by hotplug (soon). When that will happen, your airport driver will also be automagically loaded and there is no way to know which one will end up eth0 and which one will end up eth1. this is a good argument for bsd style network interfaces /dev/vr0 /dev/fxp0 /d

Re: apt (intentionally?) brain dead?

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 13.10.2005, 15:09 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Pfeiffer: > > Try without --simulate, > > Sure. And risk that apt will remove essential packages? ... :) Apt > being removing stuff is a well-known behavior currently in unstable > Debian, so clearly, Michel, with all due respect: N

Re: powerpc d-i daily builds reactivated, use 2.6.12 kernels, including 64bit kernels, miboot floppies dropped for now.

On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 01:28:00PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote: > Le jeudi 13 octobre 2005 à 13:14 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit : > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote: > > > Le lundi 10 octobre 2005 à 15:24 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit : > > > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:

Re: apt (intentionally?) brain dead?

Hi Michel Hi All On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 01:04:59PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 00:13 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > > [ ... ] > > > > > > Again: Is it brain dead software or a feature? > > > > Or what did I miss? > > Try without --simulate, Sure. And risk tha

Re: powerpc d-i daily builds reactivated, use 2.6.12 kernels, including 64bit kernels, miboot floppies dropped for now.

Le jeudi 13 octobre 2005 à 13:14 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit : > On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote: > > Le lundi 10 octobre 2005 à 15:24 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit : > > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:14:00PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:03:

Re: How to get rid of sungem at boot time?

On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:57:00AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 00:12 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > So anyone knows which app/config at boot time might be responsible for > > loading the sungem stuff? > > I already completely removed discover to fix this: >

Re: powerpc d-i daily builds reactivated, use 2.6.12 kernels, including 64bit kernels, miboot floppies dropped for now.

On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote: > Le lundi 10 octobre 2005 à 15:24 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit : > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:14:00PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:03:13PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: > > > > > Nope, they are available s

Re: apt (intentionally?) brain dead?

On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 00:13 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > [root@ 19:04:02]# apt-get --simulate install gconf2 > > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree... 0% > Building dependency tree... Done > You might want to run `apt-get -f install

Presence of airport extreme cart [was: How to get rid of sungem at boot time?]

Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > Besides, it's a good thing > anyway as the sungem driver will deal with power management of the chip > even when you are not using it, for example, for sleep mode. It's just a > wrong way of thinking that you should remove drivers for HW you do not > use in fact :)