On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 12:27:51AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Does it help to remember that SMP-safe is irrelevant to OldWorld Pmacs,
> since there are none-such?
Actually, there are. Apple even shipped a few of them that way, plus
there were upgrade cards available. I purchased a dual 200MHz up
On Aug 21 2005, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Does it help to remember that SMP-safe is irrelevant to OldWorld Pmacs,
> since there are none-such?
False. PowerMacs 9500/180MP (which are OldWorld) are SMP, as the name
implies.
Regards,
--
Rogério Brito : [EMAIL PROTECTED] : http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito
On Aug 20, 2005, at 11:34 AM, vinai wrote:
One thing to keep in mind is that the swim3 driver in the Old World
Pmacs hasn't been properly updated for the 2.6 series of kernels. Last
I checked, I think the driver now compiles, but I can't remember if it
even works. I'll take a look soon.
A whi
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 03:52:13PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Aug 20, 2005, at 4:14 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >Well, the sarge 2.4 miboot floppies already installs a 2.6 kernel (or
> >should),
> >and if what you are hinting at is on-the-fly takeover of kernels, this
> >is not
> >possible
On Aug 20, 2005, at 4:14 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
The plan is that in the year or so upto the etch release, we will trim
down
the 2.6 kernel to miboot-size, free miboot or find a better solution,
and fix
the miboot+2.6 worked once in oldenbourg 2004 and never since problem.
Removing the lega
On Aug 20, 2005, at 4:14 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, the sarge 2.4 miboot floppies already installs a 2.6 kernel (or
should),
and if what you are hinting at is on-the-fly takeover of kernels, this
is not
possible (yet :).
That's exactly what I was proposing (on-the-fly takeover of kernels)
hi all,
i guess there has already been discussion about it, but i need a good
wireless card (by good i mean fast) that runs well with debian sarge
kernel 2.6.11, on an ibook g4.
can you suggest some known to work well?
thanks a lot,-- emmanuele
On Aug 19, 2005, Sven Luther wrote
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 03:27:36AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>>
>> .
>>
>> Hmmm...
>>
>> Would it be possible to build a boot floppy using a fixed-config
>> stripped-down version of (say) the 2.4 kernel, with just enough
>
> No, there will be no more 2.4 po
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 03:27:36AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Aug 19, 2005, at 9:35 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 05:00:44AM -0300, Rog?rio Brito wrote:
> >>On Aug 18 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> >>>I was forced to disable the floppy builds for now, since they failed
>
On Aug 19, 2005, at 9:35 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 05:00:44AM -0300, Rog?rio Brito wrote:
On Aug 18 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
I was forced to disable the floppy builds for now, since they failed
to
build, and the 2.6.12 kernels are 200K too big anyway for miboot
floppies,
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 11:21:39AM -0400, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 10:02 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > But yes, a. is a major undertaking, and i was hoping of some automated
> > method
> > for generating the 64 bit stuff, maybe even in the same package. Needs some
> > expe
11 matches
Mail list logo
