Re: -L not working properly?

2002-06-16 Thread Jason E. Stewart
"Daniel Jacobowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > So am I delusional, and -L never worked in 'last seen, first used' > > > order? I thought the whole point was to be able to do things like: > > > > > > -L/priv/lib1 -llib1 -L/priv/lib2 -lib2 -L/priv/lib2 -lib3 ... > > > > > > and ensure you

Re: -L not working properly?

2002-06-16 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 11:23:37PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Sun, 2002-06-16 at 02:00, Jason E. Stewart wrote: > > "Michel Dänzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > I thought the order of -L flags was 'last seen, first used'? What > > > > would make the linker not use that order? > >

Re: -L not working properly?

2002-06-16 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2002-06-16 at 02:00, Jason E. Stewart wrote: > "Michel Dänzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > I thought the order of -L flags was 'last seen, first used'? What > > > would make the linker not use that order? > > > >The directories are searched in the order in which they

[OT] New upstream dev version of mol with improved linux-on-linux support...

2002-06-16 Thread David Stanaway
The developers have notified the general list that they have some major changes in their bitkeeper sources that they would like tested. I thought that people on debian-powerpc might be interested even if it is slightly off-topic. Full message with bk/rsync details..: http://lists.maconlinux.org/