Re: gcc -mxxx=???

2001-06-17 Thread Peter Cordes
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 01:56:45PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > > My $CFLAGS looks like this: -pipe -O2 -Wall -mcpu=750 -fstrict-aliasing > > It's not entirely clear from the gcc docs if code generated this way runs on > older CPUs than G3s though. Should I rather use -mtune=750? What would b

Re: SCSI I/O errors galore

2001-06-17 Thread Andrew Sharp
You didn't mention which model of old world you have. That makes a difference. a Jamie Hutt wrote: > > Hi all! > I just moved up in the world from Debian on a 68000 machine to potato on an > Old World PowerPC Mac. > My install went well and the setup is pretty straight-forward. However, when >

Re: Can anyone help test CD images?

2001-06-17 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 03:31:33PM -0600, Nate Duehr wrote: > Ethan, > > Little confused here, and I saw some other questions about it on the > lists -- should I be using my sid machine to build CD's, or a potato > machine with updated mkisofs only? the only thing that matters AFAICT is mkisofs.

Re: mozilla - 5 processes using 149Mb

2001-06-17 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 11:09:11AM -0700, Taro Fukunaga wrote: > > As for Flash, I'm not sure... there is a free software flash plugin that works with mozilla on freshmeat, just do a search for `flash' and you should find it. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpZcpXIIh3r3.pg

Re: PPPoE and boot floppies

2001-06-17 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 12:43:24PM -0400, Russell Hires wrote: > > So, what I want to do is take the binary that was created in my fully > installed system, pack it up using tar, and then transport it to my > new-install system, so I can be in the ramdisk, and then untar it so > that it works, and

Re: Woody Boot Floppies Report

2001-06-17 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 04:51:23PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > That's a shame, because it'll leave a lot of people that can't use network > or CDROM to install from out in the cold. i agree > Sure, but the 'install base system from a single tarball, have yourself a > functional system' was

Re: Can anyone help test CD images?

2001-06-17 Thread Nate Duehr
Ethan, Little confused here, and I saw some other questions about it on the lists -- should I be using my sid machine to build CD's, or a potato machine with updated mkisofs only? Little worried about coming up with invalid tests for you and don't want to do that. Did Phil ever reply about what

Re: IBM 43P, kernel 2.4.x, LVM, reiser.

2001-06-17 Thread Noah John
try just getting the s3 xserver _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

Re: New iBook and Debian

2001-06-17 Thread Michel Dänzer
Tom Rini wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 02:30:35AM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 02:09:42AM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > > > Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > > > > 4.0.x in woody worked great too and the 4.1.0 debs in testing work > > > > > f

Re: mozilla - 5 processes using 149Mb

2001-06-17 Thread Taro Fukunaga
Hi, Use the JDK from here: http://penguinppc.org/usr/java/ I built mozilla 0.9.1 myself and put a symlink to /usr/local/j2sdk1.3.0/jre/plugin/ppc/javaplugin.so in /usr/local/mozilla-0.9.1/bin/plugins As for Flash, I'm not sure... -- Taro Artur Gorniak wrote: is there java-vm for mozill

PPPoE and boot floppies

2001-06-17 Thread Russell Hires
Okay, I'm installing my Debian Woody (aka Testing) distro, but in order to get all the files off the Internet, I have to have my PPPoE connection working. To do this, I got the PPPoE software from Roaring Penguin. It compiles and installs fine on a completely installed system, but I can't do that

Re: Woody Boot Floppies Report

2001-06-17 Thread Russell Hires
> The 'need to rebuild' thing was more of a makefile bug than anything else > (split boot-floppies in multiple packages, one for base, one for the > ramdisks, yadda yadda) and be done with a debian/rules base ... I agree with this. What's wrong with rsync? I would think that since it's so useful

Re: SCSI I/O errors galore

2001-06-17 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > scsidisk I/O error: dev 08:08 , sector 298272 > > host 0 channel 0 id 1 lun 0 return code 600 > > MACHINE CHECK IN KERNEL (regs at cd3bfd40 mode) Please post the complete error messages. The return code looks like a timeout but the SCSI code should say so, and properly handle timeouts (no

Re: tripwire for ppc (was: tripwire & freeswan in debian-ppc)

2001-06-17 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > Yep. Build it from source. You'll need to have a close look at the source > > for that, > > That's too complicated for me alone :( > Not beeing a C developer. > Did someone succeed in compiling tripwire for ppc from source? Yep. Didn't build. The bug was already filed (and quite old) so I didn

SCSI I/O errors galore

2001-06-17 Thread Jamie Hutt
Hi all! I just moved up in the world from Debian on a 68000 machine to potato on an Old World PowerPC Mac. My install went well and the setup is pretty straight-forward. However, when I'm doing a large file copy from one Mac to the Debian box via SAMBA (and FTP too!) the collision lights on my hubs

tripwire for ppc (was: tripwire & freeswan in debian-ppc)

2001-06-17 Thread Karl-Heinz Haag
Quoting Michael Schmitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > I want to use tripwire-2.3.?? and freeswan also on the macppc platform > > within Debian. > > > > Do you see possibilities for realizing that? > > Yep. Build it from source. You'll need to have a close look at the source > for that, That's too com

Re: Woody Boot Floppies Report

2001-06-17 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > connect to the net, I can't, because I have DSL connection that uses > > PPPoE. This is where the base tarball would have helped me out a lot. > > i don't know what can be done about that hideous thing known as > pppoe. but the base tarball is dead and will likely never return. That's a sham

Re: Just how stable IS Debian PPC

2001-06-17 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > I am getting Debian PPC, from a guy on the net, but I was wondering how > > stable is it? I have an iMac DVSE, and was wondering, before I get it, will > > its very stable, though it does depend on the kernel you run. 2.4 has > alot of funnies that you won't find very funny. Yep, stick w

Sound on G4 Cube

2001-06-17 Thread Karl-Heinz Haag
*sound on/with G4 Cube* How to configure? Apples tech-information only tells: "Sound card 16-Bit -PCI- 44.1 KHz stereo" and "Audio Output -- Sound card -PCI- integrated" Which hardware is this? Is kernel 2.2.19 sufficient? Which modules do I need to compile? Is there something special abou

Re: tripwire & freeswan in debian-ppc

2001-06-17 Thread Michael Schmitz
> I want to use tripwire-2.3.?? and freeswan also on the macppc platform > within Debian. > > Do you see possibilities for realizing that? Yep. Build it from source. You'll need to have a close look at the source for that, it's horribly broken (ends up with utter confusion, unable to tell whether

Re: compiling gimp 1.2

2001-06-17 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > apt-get install gimp1.2 > > > > ? > > because i am wet behind the ears and upgrading to testing will directly > increase my postings on this list ten fold. Upgrading to testing isn't actually all that awful. Michael

Re: compiling gimp 1.2

2001-06-17 Thread Steven Hanley
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 02:39:09PM +0200, sisi wrote: > > > > thanks, i already had looked at his site, and what he is doing looks > > > very interesting. but i agree that i shouldn't need gnome, and i am > > > going to try to compile GTK. if that doesn't work then i will plunge > > > into dselect

Re: mozilla 0.9.1 packages up

2001-06-17 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 01:55:53PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > er sorry its at the usual place: > > > > deb http://penguinppc.org/~eb/mozilla ./ > > Ok, thanks. I do have another question, though. None of the packages > seem to contain li

Re: compiling gimp 1.2

2001-06-17 Thread sisi
> > thanks, i already had looked at his site, and what he is doing looks > > very interesting. but i agree that i shouldn't need gnome, and i am > > going to try to compile GTK. if that doesn't work then i will plunge > > into dselect. > > Maybe I'm missing something, but why don't you just upgra

Re: mozilla 0.9.1 packages up

2001-06-17 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > er sorry its at the usual place: > > deb http://penguinppc.org/~eb/mozilla ./ Ok, thanks. I do have another question, though. None of the packages seem to contain libmozjpeg.so, although libnsjpg.so needs it. So I had to add my nightly path to ld.so

Re: mozilla - 5 processes using 149Mb

2001-06-17 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 09:18:21PM +1200, Alan Macdougall wrote: > Vital stats: Pwer Macintosh 7600/200MHz/64Mb running Woody. > > Mozilla 0.9 seems a bit of a hog. (This is build 2001052403 downloaded > from Ethan's penguinppc repository.) > > Typing "mozilla" at the command line seems to cause

Re: mozilla - 5 processes using 149Mb

2001-06-17 Thread Artur Gorniak
is there java-vm for mozilla? I'm trying to use kaffe. Just started.. Tried to use java-2 from netscape but it's not installing.. Of course I do this in next few hours diffrent way but first I want to know if there is flash, java aso. for this platform. Artur Górniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- ADV:

mozilla - 5 processes using 149Mb

2001-06-17 Thread Alan Macdougall
Vital stats: Pwer Macintosh 7600/200MHz/64Mb running Woody. Mozilla 0.9 seems a bit of a hog. (This is build 2001052403 downloaded from Ethan's penguinppc repository.) Typing "mozilla" at the command line seems to cause 5 separate processes to be started, taking in total 149Mb of memory (accorti

potato with: task-debian-devel (woody), kernel 2.4.x

2001-06-17 Thread Artur Gorniak
hi as my workstation is PowerPC and I have to use some of application from unstable I backported all required packages. You can use them from: deb http://ftp.grey.debian.pl/ stable . There are some info about them at: http://ftp.grey.debian.pl/potato.html It's mostly in Polish. Just I don't have