Re: Airport support in 2.4.x kernel

2001-03-17 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 01:11:12AM +0200, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote: > By the way, make sure you secure your wireless so it is not open for > everyone with DHCP.. There are WAY too many of these, while it may be > "convenient" to get free internet to a hotel room from a nearby new > media agency, it i

Re: Airport support in 2.4.x kernel

2001-03-17 Thread Tuomas Kuosmanen
On 16 Mar 2001 22:47:56 -0800, Alan DuBoff wrote: > I am so excited to send you the first message over my airport using the > wireless in the room next to my office... By the way, make sure you secure your wireless so it is not open for everyone with DHCP.. There are WAY too many of these, while i

Re: Airport support in 2.4.x kernel

2001-03-17 Thread Tuomas Kuosmanen
On 16 Mar 2001 22:47:56 -0800, Alan DuBoff wrote: > I am so excited to send you the first message over my airport using the > wireless in the room next to my office... By the way, make sure you secure your wireless so it is not open for everyone with DHCP.. There are WAY too many of these, while i

Re: netatalk causes kernel panic

2001-03-17 Thread Kevin van Haaren
At 05:16 -0900 3/17/2001, Ethan Benson wrote: yup, i just wrote my own initscript for it and disabled the regular netatalk script. here is the relevant portion of my initscript to start afpd, based on /etc/init.d/skeleton, nothing special: start) echo -n "Starting $DESC: " s

Re: netatalk causes kernel panic

2001-03-17 Thread Kevin van Haaren
At 01:09 -0900 3/17/2001, Ethan Benson wrote: On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 11:45:20PM -0600, Kevin van Haaren wrote: > > Now when I start netatalk it kernel panics. the first line of the panic is: > mojo kernel: Kernel panic: kernel access of bad area pc 0 lr c8111780 > address 0 tsk atalkd/363

Re: netatalk causes kernel panic

2001-03-17 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 08:04:50AM -0600, Kevin van Haaren wrote: > > i have: > > mojo -tcp -noddp > > but didn't realize i could get rid of atalkd after doing that. yup, i just wrote my own initscript for it and disabled the regular netatalk script. > When I compile a kernel can I drop the

Re: Airport support in 2.4.x kernel

2001-03-17 Thread Kevin van Haaren
At 01:21 -0900 3/17/2001, Ethan Benson wrote: in the past the included .config was useful for people since it was a generic config that worked on most powerpcs, this configuration will on the other hand BREAK on the majority of systems. I'd have to agree with this, I've always treated the defau

Re: netatalk causes kernel panic

2001-03-17 Thread Kevin van Haaren
At 01:09 -0900 3/17/2001, Ethan Benson wrote: i have had this in my afpd.conf: plato -tcp -noddp -nosetpassword -nouservol -noguest which works quite nicely in standalone appletalk free setup. appletalk sucks, get rid of it. the atalkd daemon makes it suck even worse, just start it and l

Need iBook/dmasound help

2001-03-17 Thread Christian Pernegger
I'm running 2.2.18-kernel.org with soundcore and dmasound as modules on my iBook Firewire but sound still does not work. I can insmod the modules just fine, but accessing /dev/dsp or /dev/audio still gives me 'no such device'. Does dmasound.o need any module parameters? Anything else I missed? T

Re: Airport support in 2.4.x kernel

2001-03-17 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 04:27:54AM +0200, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote: > This sounds very much like DevFS. Install devfsd package that should set > up the partition names for you in /dev. The problem with devfs is all > the partitions look different, as it is not /dev/hda1 but something like > /dev/dis

Re: netatalk causes kernel panic

2001-03-17 Thread Ethan Benson
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 11:45:20PM -0600, Kevin van Haaren wrote: > > Now when I start netatalk it kernel panics. the first line of the panic is: > mojo kernel: Kernel panic: kernel access of bad area pc 0 lr c8111780 > address 0 tsk atalkd/363 > > Everything else seems to work fine. Anyone go

Re: Airport support in 2.4.x kernel

2001-03-17 Thread Alan DuBoff
Michel Lanners wrote: > Rememebr the fine options to ifconfig ;-) running 'ifconfig' without > options will only show you configured interfaces, not unconfigured ones. > Running 'ifconfig -a' will show _all_ interfaces. No, that was not it as I was using ifconfig -a to get all the interfaces. The

Re: Airport support in 2.4.x kernel

2001-03-17 Thread Michel Lanners
On 17 Mar, this message from Tuomas Kuosmanen echoed through cyberspace: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 09:46:55PM -0800, thus said Alan DuBoff: >> You have set me on the right track here. I have the module now, and was able >> to insmod it, but I don't see any wireless interfaces, so will go to the >

Re: Help with X on iBook?

2001-03-17 Thread Kin Chung
Seemed strange indeed. So I just looked at the source again and saw that I had forgotten something. "UseFBDev" only works if you specify the bus ID in the Device Section, like BusID "PCI:0:16:0" Interesting item that one... I ought to try see what happens without that line. I do have

Re: Airport support in 2.4.x kernel

2001-03-17 Thread Alan DuBoff
Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote: > Whee :) It's always nice to see replies like this! It's always nice to send replies like that!;-) > It is "airport", not eth0 or wavelan0. So you can "ifconfig airport blah > blah" > ... > So how iwconfig works? Some examples: > ... > Yea. And I'm afraid there is no poi

Re: Airport support in 2.4.x kernel

2001-03-17 Thread Tuomas Kuosmanen
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 09:46:55PM -0800, thus said Alan DuBoff: > Bingo! A million thanks for posting that response Tuomas!!! I went into > the kernel configuration and saw the auto mount option set to yes, set it to > no, recompiled and I've just boot for the first time with the 2.4.3-pre3 >