> >I'd be willing to take over this package, as soon as the DAM creates
> >my account etc. (I'm almost through the NM process).
> >
> >Where do you put the upstream source for pmud. I looked at the url
> >listed in the debian/copyright file in the current debian package for
> >pmud, and that just
>Ok, but I'm not the maintainer. In fact, it looks like Joel Klecker
>is listed as the maintainer
>
>I'd be willing to take over this package, as soon as the DAM creates
>my account etc. (I'm almost through the NM process).
>
>Where do you put the upstream source for pmud. I looked at the url
Yes, pmud is insecure... but it only allows connections from the
localhost. Now that don't mean a thing, as someone - not the console
user - can login and have the machine sleep. There are however more
security implications in pmud. For example, there is some crude checking
on the ownership and per
Hi Stephan,
Just thought you should be aware of a discussion on the debian-powerpc mailing
list about your pmud utility. For the full thread, see the list archives
available from the debian website (www.debian.org). Thanks..
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 11:36:46AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> >
> > Short of recompiling with the port 879 bind/listen disabled? No. And I
> > don't think this is required. I'm in no mood to summarize the argument on
> > that point again - pmud is only accessible to the local user, and it
> > _should_ be accessible to the local user. If you can't trust the loca
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 10:10:07PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>
> Short of recompiling with the port 879 bind/listen disabled? No. And I
> don't think this is required. I'm in no mood to summarize the argument on
> that point again - pmud is only accessible to the local user, and it
> _should_
6 matches
Mail list logo
