Re: XFBDev problem

2000-10-13 Thread Derek Homeier
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > > I didn't compile the whole package myself, only Ani's ati driver, the > > > > rest was installed from rpm (yeah, making this more appropriate for > > > > > > Make sure the rpm was for 4.01 not 4.0 - 4.01 drivers don't mix with 4.0 X > > > serve

Re: Woody binutils safe yet?

2000-10-13 Thread Brian Almeida
Me and Dan compiled the fixed version last night. They were installed this afternoon. On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 01:32:14PM -0700, C.M. Connelly wrote: > > Dan, > > Are the binutils (and libc6 and gcc) packages in woody safe to > install yet? Or should we hang on for a couple more days? > > (If

Re: Woody binutils safe yet?

2000-10-13 Thread Patrice LaFlamme
Hello, I just did an upgrade a few minutes ago, and they seem to be safe. I was able to run Netscape and try out Opera, and both worked. Patrix. On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 01:32:14PM -0700 or thereabouts, C.M. Connelly wrote: > > Dan, > > Are the binutils (and libc6 and gcc) packages in woody sa

Woody binutils safe yet?

2000-10-13 Thread C.M. Connelly
Dan, Are the binutils (and libc6 and gcc) packages in woody safe to install yet? Or should we hang on for a couple more days? (If they aren't safe, it would be great if you or someone else ``in the know'' could let us know when they are.) Thanks. CMC +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=

Re: pmud 0.7-1

2000-10-13 Thread Sam Powers
> > Speaking of pmud, is there any way to have something run when the machine > > wakes? my trackpad settings disappear on wake, and i figure doing trackpad > > notap on wake might help that.. > > The pmud 0.7 release was designed to restore the trackpad settings on > wakeup (from data pmud stored

Re: XFBDev problem

2000-10-13 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > > I didn't compile the whole package myself, only Ani's ati driver, the > > > rest was installed from rpm (yeah, making this more appropriate for > > > > Make sure the rpm was for 4.01 not 4.0 - 4.01 drivers don't mix with 4.0 X > > servers. > > > Yes, it's the 4.0.1-0.36a build from Franz S

Re: XFBDev problem

2000-10-13 Thread Michel Dänzer
Derek Homeier wrote: > I just managed to clear 200MB of disk space for the build and reinstall from > source. Same symptoms so far, but then I did some more experimenting and it > turned out that it rather seems to be an application-specific problem: > > Under Window Maker, XF4 crashes frequently

Re: XFBDev problem

2000-10-13 Thread Derek Homeier
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > With a self compiled X 4.01 from Ani's sources, X is rock solid on my > > > Lombard (15 bpp, 24 bpp, you name it). With 2.2.17pre, 2.2.18pre (BenH > > > rsync) or 2.4.0-test9 (Paul's rsync). What am I doing wrong? > > > > > If you find out, pleas

Re: Sound on the ibook

2000-10-13 Thread Keun-woo Ryu
> "KD" == Kelsey Damas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: KD> Has anyone gotten it working? I'm using dma sound module from thispage http://students.washington.edu/mpalczew/ updong:~$ lsmod Module Size Used by dmasound 30176 0 (unused) edit modules file. updon

Re: Please test: pmud 0.7-2 in unstable (was: Re: pmud 0.7-1)

2000-10-13 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
>No G3, no luck ;) > >BTW, as a 3400 and pmud user, I can report that I had to comment out the >the hdparm lines from pwrctl to get reliable operation. Also, I had >problems with pmud spontaneously shutting off the network on me (there was >some low power state in pwrctl that did that) that I also

Re: Please test: pmud 0.7-2 in unstable (was: Re: pmud 0.7-1)

2000-10-13 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> >Ben, do you happen to know which package your trackpad tool belongs to? >I've added a 'show' option to make it report the current settings to help >catch problems with the trackpad state restore in future. I don't know... but send me the new version so I can put it on my page. >That's why I s

Re: Tweaking Kernel Makefile

2000-10-13 Thread Xavier Grave
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Eric Reischer wrote: > If I "tweak" the top-level makefile for a 2.3 kernel to force the ARCH > variable to be PPC instead of running uname -m, would that produce a > successful compile for a PowerPC kernel, providing I get the makefiles > correct? It seems too easy, and I