Re: [ANN] JDK 1.3.0 Beta B2, JDK 1.2.2 FCS and JDK 1.1.8 V3 for PPP Linux

2000-08-07 Thread Kevin B. Hendricks
Whoops! Nothing like posting the wrong url! Sorry about that. I can't seem to type at all today (notice the subject line with its PPP Linux and not PPC Linux). As Jeramy correctly posted, the correct URL is http://linuxppc.org/usr/java Oh well! Kevin > > http://linuxppc.org/user/java > >

Re: [ANN] JDK 1.3.0 Beta B2, JDK 1.2.2 FCS and JDK 1.1.8 V3 for PPP Linux

2000-08-07 Thread jeramy b smith
"Kevin B. Hendricks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://linuxppc.org/user/java > > http://linuxppc.org/usr/java Have Fun! -Jeramy Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webmail.netscape.c

Re: install-info seg faults

2000-08-07 Thread Tom Vier
opps, thought the first message didn't make it. list was lagged. -- Tom Vier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> DSA Key id 0x27371A2C

[ANN] JDK 1.3.0 Beta B2, JDK 1.2.2 FCS and JDK 1.1.8 V3 for PPP Linux

2000-08-07 Thread Kevin B. Hendricks
ANNOUNCING: JDK 1.1.8 FCS, JDK 1.2.2 FCS, and JDK 1.3.0 Beta 2 For PPC Linux distributions Blackdown Organization is pleased to announce the availability of JDK 1.1.8, JDK 1.2.2 and JDK 1.3.0 Beta 2 for current PPC Linux distributions. See the new for Java on PPC Linux Website at:

install-info seg faults

2000-08-07 Thread Tom Vier
is anyone else having install-info seg fault? it seems to be a bug in libz. before i go dive into libz, is anyone already looking into it? here's the backtrace: (gdb) run Starting program: /sbin/install-info (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... Program received signal SI

Re: powerpc build daemon vs apt-get -b source

2000-08-07 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 11:43:26AM -0700, Matt Brubeck wrote: > To automatically see the package tree differences by architecture, go to: > > http://buildd.debian.org/quinn-diff/ > > Note that there is no autobuilder running for woody/ppc. The powerpc build > daemon will switch to woody once pota

Re: XF4 binaries, Evolution 0.3 and updated Helix-Gnome

2000-08-07 Thread Michel Dänzer
Alan Buxey wrote: > > The big 22 megs tarball is XFree86 4.0.1 - plain. The small tarball named > > drivers-2731.tar.gz contains Ani Joshi updated drivers. They are much > > needed if you don't have a Rage 128. > > okay. I have a PermediaII gfx card, running on APUS ...will I have > problems

Re: Another Poor Documentation Rant

2000-08-07 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > In this case, Debian/PPC is not for you. Not yet. Period. > > > > Wow, that's quite a statement. Some aspects of Debian are harder > > (installation, poor > > I don't think it's quite a statement. First off, Debian isn't even > released for PowerPC. It's in testing,

Re: XF4 binaries, Evolution 0.3 and updated Helix-Gnome

2000-08-07 Thread Alan Buxey
hi, > so there is a README file at > http://hadess.free.fr/files/xf4/README.XFree86-4.0.1 > and the files at: > http://hadess.free.fr/files/xf4/ thanks. > The big 22 megs tarball is XFree86 4.0.1 - plain. The small tarball named > drivers-2731.tar.gz contains Ani Joshi updated drivers. The

Re: XF86 4 Binaries

2000-08-07 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > I have a G4 400 w/ a rage 128 pro. I am currently using Xpmac rev10 and > > sometimes get frame buffer overflows when i switch to console from X . I am > > using 1600x1200 resolution, would lowering the resolution fix the overflows, > > or would X4 fix it? > > Can you please define 'framebuffe

Re: XF4 binaries, Evolution 0.3 and updated Helix-Gnome

2000-08-07 Thread Hadess
Quoting Alan Buxey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > :-) > > okay...so do i just download the big 22Mb file and thats all, or do I > have > to also take the smaller files too? > > alan Sorry, me not very happy, their Apache configuration is hiding the README files ! so there is a README file at http://h

Re: XF4 binaries, Evolution 0.3 and updated Helix-Gnome

2000-08-07 Thread Alan Buxey
hi, > > > And for the XF4 binaries (not in .deb, but shouldn't mess up your config > > > to much), are at http://hadess.net/files/xf4 > > Are they any different than those provided by Michel Danzer ? (You can find > > a link to his repository from linux-apus.sourceforege.net page) > > His are ne

Re: XF4 binaries, Evolution 0.3 and updated Helix-Gnome

2000-08-07 Thread Hadess
Hi, Thanks Michel for replying while I'm away from my computer (heh!). I compiled this XFree86 4.0.1 on a Debian Potato to which I made no major changes. It is a tarball that unpacks in /usr/X11R6.4 (and not /usr/X11R6), so shouldn't hurt too much dpkg (a rm -rf /usr/X11R6.4 is enough to remo

Kernel Panic: no init found

2000-08-07 Thread Aaron Davies
I've completed the basic installation from the rescue floppy ramdisk, but when I turn the ramdisk off and tell BootX to boot with /dev/sda5 (my Linux native partition) as root, I get the following error message: Kernel panic: no init found. Try passing init= option to kernel. Rebooting in 180 sec

Re: XF86 4 Binaries

2000-08-07 Thread Michel Dänzer
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > > Earlier on this list I saw a link to these binaries. > http://n.ethz.ch/student/daenzerm/download/XFree86/ > Are these the most current X4 binaries? No. http://dev.linuxppc.org/pub/users/howarth/xf4/ (RPMs) or http://hadess.net/files/xf4 (tarballs) Also, there a

Re: XF4 binaries, Evolution 0.3 and updated Helix-Gnome

2000-08-07 Thread Michel Dänzer
Robert Ramiega wrote: > > And for the XF4 binaries (not in .deb, but shouldn't mess up your config > > to much), are at http://hadess.net/files/xf4 > Are they any different than those provided by Michel Danzer ? (You can find > a link to his repository from linux-apus.sourceforege.net page) His