Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 08:06:44PM +1000, Brendan J Simon wrote: > Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > Do I need a kernel parameter option ? ie. video= ? > > > No, I assume you're already using aty128fb. > > I didn't have any video options set. I set video=aty128fb in yaboot.conf but > it > doesn't m

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Brendan J Simon
Tom Rini wrote: > Nope. Right now in 2.3.99preX (and for a while before) all usb mice look the > same. With the evdev stuff, usb stuff looks even more the same (no more > keycode translations). BTW, type "auto" doesn't seem to be too happy anywhere > (friend of mine on x86 warned me against usi

44Khz Sound

2000-05-09 Thread Sinan Gürkan
Hello What are the ideal bootstrap arguments to get 44Khz output from LinuxAPUS with Bvision ? Thanks -- Sinan Gürkan http://www.amigart.com http://sanalkultur.cjb.net A1300T + BlizzardPPC 166 Mhz + BvisionPPC 8MB + 64MB RAM

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Sven LUTHER wrote: > On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 10:52:12AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > > > but when i enter a bad login in gdm, the gdm requester shivers from right > > > to > > > left and vice versa, about 10-20 pixels, becoming less, before > > > stabilizing. > > >

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 05:44:33PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Brendan J Simon wrote: > > > The X server does get further on the G4. It recognises the video > > chip fine but it gets stuck with the pointer and keyboard devices. > > I went to the XFree86 Australian mirror and read the online doc

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Michel Dänzer
Brendan J Simon wrote: > The X server does get further on the G4. It recognises the video > chip fine but it gets stuck with the pointer and keyboard devices. > I went to the XFree86 Australian mirror and read the online documentation > for 4.0. It says for USB mouse to use either "usb" or "auto

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 09:51:56AM +1000, Brendan J Simon wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > How recent a kernel do I need ? One from CVS ? > > > I am using the one from Ben H's site (vmlinux-2.2.15pre14). > > > > For a mach64 chip, you might need a 2.3.x kernel - don't know exactly. > > > > B

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 10:52:12AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > but when i enter a bad login in gdm, the gdm requester shivers from right to > > left and vice versa, about 10-20 pixels, becoming less, before stabilizing. > > Did you already encounter such a problem ? >

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Sven LUTHER wrote: > but when i enter a bad login in gdm, the gdm requester shivers from right to > left and vice versa, about 10-20 pixels, becoming less, before stabilizing. > Did you already encounter such a problem ? To quote Microsoft, "That's not a bug, it's a feature." I think it's kind o

Re: Performa 6200 family question

2000-05-09 Thread Eberhard Knechtel
MKLinux wont run on that class of powermac (5200,5300,6200,6300).But I dont know why. Btw the 6100 has a NuBus and is supported by MKLinux.

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Brendan J Simon
Michel Dänzer wrote: > > How recent a kernel do I need ? One from CVS ? > > I am using the one from Ben H's site (vmlinux-2.2.15pre14). > > For a mach64 chip, you might need a 2.3.x kernel - don't know exactly. > > But as you have a Rage128, it doesn't matter, you can use the fbdev driver > (unti

Re: Performa 6200 family question

2000-05-09 Thread David Weinehall
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Pete Toich wrote: > Hi, > > Can anyone tell me or point me to more information on why the Performa > 6200 (PPC 603) family can not run linux? Simply because it has an NuBus, not a PCI-bus, and noone has had enough information to finish NuBus-support for the kernel. Either you

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Michel Dänzer
Brendan J Simon wrote: > > If it's in fact from the mach64 family, you'll have to use the fbdev > > driver for now - you might need a recent kernel which corrects broken OF > > PCI memory ranges from though. > > How recent a kernel do I need ? One from CVS ? > I am using the one from Ben H's sit

Performa 6200 family question

2000-05-09 Thread Pete Toich
Hi, Can anyone tell me or point me to more information on why the Performa 6200 (PPC 603) family can not run linux? Thanks Peter Toich __ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Brendan J Simon
Michel Dänzer wrote: > > (--) PCI: (0:16:0) ATI unknown chipset (0x4c46) rev 2, Mem @ > > 0xa400/26, 0xa000/14, I/O @ 0x0400/8 > > Are you sure the chip in those Notebooks is from the Rage128 family? Yep. It is a Rage 128 Mobility chip. > If it's in fact from the mach64 family, you

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 01:39:11PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 11:22:56AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > Brendan J Simon wrote: > > > > (--) PCI: (0:16:0) ATI unknown chipset (0x4c46) rev 2, Mem @ >

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Michel Dänzer
Sven LUTHER wrote: > > On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 11:22:56AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > Brendan J Simon wrote: > > > (--) PCI: (0:16:0) ATI unknown chipset (0x4c46) rev 2, Mem @ ^^ > > > 0xa400/26, 0xa000/14, I/O @ 0x0400/8 > > >

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 11:22:56AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Brendan J Simon wrote: > > > > > (WW) r128: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:0:16:0) > > > > found > > > > (EE) No devices detected. > > > > (--) PCI: (0:16:0) ATI unknown chipset (0x4c46) rev 2, Mem @ > > 0xa4

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Michel Dänzer
Brendan J Simon wrote: > > > (WW) r128: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:0:16:0) > > > found > > > (EE) No devices detected. > > (--) PCI: (0:16:0) ATI unknown chipset (0x4c46) rev 2, Mem @ > 0xa400/26, 0xa000/14, I/O @ 0x0400/8 Are you sure the chip in those Notebo

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Brendan J Simon
Does this work on the new Apple PowerBook (the one with FireWire) ? I have installed the XFree86 4.0 server and get the following errors in the log file. It seems to be looking at "BusID PCI:0:16:0: even though the XF86Config expicitly states "BusID 0:1:0". Can someone post a working XF86Config f

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Brendan J Simon
Nelson Abramson wrote: > Brendan J Simon wrote: > > > Does this work on the new Apple PowerBook (the one with FireWire) ? > > I have installed the XFree86 4.0 server and get the following errors in the > > log file. > > It seems to be looking at "BusID PCI:0:16:0: even though the XF86Config > >