On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 03:43:18PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You can use dd with (the data fork of) a MacOS DiskCopy image, as long
> as it was created as a read/write image (not sure if read-only works;
> read-only compressed definitely doesn't). I've checked. You can also
> use plain bi
On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 04:16:49PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Also: I was getting weird 'exec format errors' or some such when
> trying to run executables on the hard drive chrooted. When I
> tried running them non-chrooted, the kernel tried feeding binaries
> to /bin/sh. And finally, by d
On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 01:34:26PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Actually, the kernel and modules are both 2.2.15pre3. I just kept the
> package version at 2.2.14 for simplicity.
I see. Well, that explains why insmods weren't getting warnings.
Busybox modprobe doesn't seem to notice or care
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 12:15:23PM +0100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> I'm not sure you can use dd with a MacOS DiskCopy image, I think they
> contain a header. Also, miBoot need to be configured via ResEdit on
> MacOS. This will change, but the current version of miBoot was mostly
> made for bo
Subject: Re: Mozilla M14 build candidate available
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 02 Mar 2000 10:52:40 CST."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
sheesh, correction #2! I need to proofread bett
On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 01:29:13PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 02:37:40AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Success reports welcomed but not expected. Failure reports only if they are
> > particularly entertaining. Expect more in the days to come.
>
> I tried inst
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 02:37:40AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Success reports welcomed but not expected. Failure reports only if they are
> particularly entertaining. Expect more in the days to come.
I tried installing this, along with the root.bin from:
http://web.espy.org/ftp/debian/r
I messed up the subject last time I sent this out and at least one list
bounced it - oops. Sorry about the extra posting to anyone who gets a dup
Note: could the kind person who Cc'ed the MkLInux list for me before do so
again? I'm not on that list and it doesn't let non-subscribers post...
On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> PReP takes a PS/2 keyboard
> PowerMac takes an ADB keyboard
> CHRP takes a PS/2 or ADB keyboard
> APUS takes an Amiga keyboard
And some PowerMac clones (those made by Power Computing) can also use PS/2
keyboards.
On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 05:46:08PM -0500, Nelson Abramson wrote:
> Josh Kuperman wrote:
> > I really can't tell if things are working or not because I haven't got
> > X going. I installed xserver-common, xdm, and a lot of X stuff. I am
> > booting through BootX. If I check the no video drivers box
Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > I have installed binutils-multiarch and dpkg-cross, but haven't found
> > actual cross compilers.
>
> beware, latest binutils-multiarch (at least on ppc) will not permit you to
> build 2.2.10 kernels.
Thanks, but I've only installed it on the Athlon (no intention to build
Subject: Mozilla M14 build candidate available
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Note: could the kind person who Cc'ed the MkLInux list for me before do so
again? I'm not on that list and it doesn't let non-subscribers post...
Mozilla M14 for Linux/PowerPC is n
On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 01:35:50PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > my question was more what do you provide more than what is already in
> > debian ?
>
> Good frontend for apt (soon anyway, right now it's a better dselect),
> graphical install, system administra
On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 01:36:07PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 06:00:16PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > [debian-x: I'm following up a thread on -powerpc]
> > >
> > > Actually, I've decided to do the sensible (?) thing
On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 06:00:16PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > [debian-x: I'm following up a thread on -powerpc]
> >
> > Actually, I've decided to do the sensible (?) thing and identify the
> > keycodes by keyboard model rather than the machine archi
Previously Sven LUTHER wrote:
> my question was more what do you provide more than what is already in debian ?
Good frontend for apt (soon anyway, right now it's a better dselect),
graphical install, system administration software. All stuff I want in
woody :)
> So what are the causes of problems
On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 12:38:09PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> If you use XF68_FBDev with XKB disabled, it will ask the kernel for the
> mapping
> keycode/keysym, and it'll work automagically with whatever type of keyboard
> you
> have. So user space programs do not have to know about a
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 06:00:16PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [debian-x: I'm following up a thread on -powerpc]
>
> Actually, I've decided to do the sensible (?) thing and identify the
> keycodes by keyboard model rather than the machine architecture. One way
> or another you can probably m
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 05:55:32PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
>
> I have installed potato on both a PowerPC and Athlon machine.
>
> As the latter is about ten times better WRT disk space and compilation times,
> it would be nice if I could cross-compile ppc stuff on it. Mainly kernels and
> g
On Thu, Mar 2, 2000, Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> So we need to have this fixed in a way or another. My idea is basically
>> to extend the mecanism used for x86 to all archs instead of just failing
>> compile, and leave the exceptional conversion to ADB keycodes for
>> powermac
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 09:25:25PM -0800, Kevin Teague wrote:
> > > A PowerPC version of Storm Linux would be the coolest, but I'm afraid we
> > > don't have anything like that in the works right now.
> > >
> >
> > What would be the problem with a powerpc version ? once potato ships, ppc
> > will
On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2000, Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I'll see with the maintainer if this can be changed to simply use PC
> >> keycodes all the time on all archs _except_ when we are running on a
> >> PowerMac (and this will be
On Thu, Mar 2, 2000, Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'll see with the maintainer if this can be changed to simply use PC
>> keycodes all the time on all archs _except_ when we are running on a
>> PowerMac (and this will be checked at runtime and not compile time).
>
>No!!! Been t
On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, BenH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2000, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Actually, I've decided to do the sensible (?) thing and identify the
> >keycodes by keyboard model rather than the machine architecture. One way
> >or another you can probably manage to plug a PC
On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 06:00:16PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > [debian-x: I'm following up a thread on -powerpc]
> >
> > Actually, I've decided to do the sensible (?) thing and identify the
> > keycodes by keyboard model rather than the machine architec
> > A PowerPC version of Storm Linux would be the coolest, but I'm afraid we
> > don't have anything like that in the works right now.
> >
>
> What would be the problem with a powerpc version ? once potato ships, ppc will
> be supported officially, so it should cost you nothing to ship a ppc versi
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 06:38:18PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> I noticed the kerberos4kth packages aren't in non-us for PPC or ARM.
> I've attached a patch which makes it build and work (basically the same
> as my old one), but the maintainer (Greg Stark) doesn't like it. His
> objections:
>
On Wed, Mar 1, 2000, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Actually, I've decided to do the sensible (?) thing and identify the
>keycodes by keyboard model rather than the machine architecture. One way
>or another you can probably manage to plug a PC keyboard into just about
>anything, so
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 06:00:16PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [debian-x: I'm following up a thread on -powerpc]
>
> Actually, I've decided to do the sensible (?) thing and identify the
> keycodes by keyboard model rather than the machine architecture. One way
> or another you can probably
29 matches
Mail list logo
