[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> And runs? (tarball + gcc 2.95.2 won't work, if they have a CVS it
> might be fine now..)
That's the setup I used (tarball of 0.10.1+gcc2.95.2, debian/potato). Heavy
use, as mail here as kerberized and I also use arla for AFS mounted shares. I
haven't seen a problem y
atyfb doesn't do much with the dual-driver nature of the lt pro. so if you
have an external monitor plugged in, macos initializes things in such a
way that linux drives the external monitor. if you leave the monitor off,
then linux will drive the lcd.
atyfb needs to be enhanced so it assigns the n
> > It would also be nice if these packages could be updated to the latest
> > upstream (0.10.1). I submitted this, but the BTS seems to have eaten it - I
> > can get to it by #52178 but I haven't heard a reply and it's not showing up
> > in
> > the package's page. Oh well, that I certainly can
Kevin Puetz wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Nothing fancy at all, just some fixes to configure.in et al because
> > ndbm.h is in /usr/include/db1 on Debian. The patch is very
> > debian-specific (or glibc2-specific?), and should probably be made
> > more generic so it looks first in the defa
On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Kevin Puetz wrote:
> It would also be nice if these packages could be updated to the latest
> upstream (0.10.1). I submitted this, but the BTS seems to have eaten it - I
> can get to it by #52178 but I haven't heard a reply and it's not showing up
> in
> the package's page
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Nothing fancy at all, just some fixes to configure.in et al because
> ndbm.h is in /usr/include/db1 on Debian. The patch is very
> debian-specific (or glibc2-specific?), and should probably be made
> more generic so it looks first in the default include path and then in
On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> FASSINO Jean-Philippe wrote:
> > I think the frame-buffer (atyfb) kernel does not run with a external
> > monitor.
> > Because in MacOS, when bouting the display change in dual screen (LCD
> > + monitor).
> > When booting linux with BootX, the FB does
Adam C Powell IV writes:
> Does atyfb work with XF68_FBDev at all? I tried it just a couple of
> weeks ago with no luck, same as since I first tried it 6 months ago.
> Empty white screen, cursor appears if you move it fast, and doesn't
> erase so you get a trail of cursors. (Jean-Philippe, is thi
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> As far as I understand it.
>
> I patch it about a year ago and got a local install, but I remember
> disliking my patches, so I never submitted them, and now they seem to
> be lost :( I'd appreciate if you could post them.
Nothing fancy at all, just some fixes to confi
FASSINO Jean-Philippe wrote:
> I think the frame-buffer (atyfb) kernel does not run with a external
> monitor.
> Because in MacOS, when bouting the display change in dual screen (LCD
> + monitor).
> When booting linux with BootX, the FB does not reconize the dual
> screen.
> It does not use it and
Hello!
(BI am trying to setup XF86Config on Debian PPC.
(BWhere is setup tool ?
(BPlease teach me how to setup X.
(B
(B/
(B
(B Kazunori Miura
(B at mount zao
(Bincoming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Boutgoing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B//
On Wed, Dec 15, 1999, Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've just compiled new 2.2.13 kernel using kernel-package, installed the
>resulting .deb, copied new vmlinux to MacOS partition, restarted, pointed
>BootX at the new kernel and after a few lines (addresses of code start, fb
>device e
Marcin Owsiany wrote:
Hi!
I've just compiled new 2.2.13 kernel using kernel-package, installed
the
resulting .deb, copied new vmlinux to MacOS partition, restarted, pointed
BootX at the new kernel and after a few lines (addresses of code start,
fb
device etc) the boot process hanged at:
booting..
Hi!
I've just compiled new 2.2.13 kernel using kernel-package, installed the
resulting .deb, copied new vmlinux to MacOS partition, restarted, pointed
BootX at the new kernel and after a few lines (addresses of code start, fb
device etc) the boot process hanged at:
booting...
thanks in advance
Mar
"Michel Dänzer" wrote:
--- FASSINO Jean-Philippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Does someone plain to add the Xpmac server in debian-powerPC ??
> >
> > I doubt it, since that was a somewhat nonstandard server (requires
it's
> own
> > kernel config option). Why do you want it? Why not just use XF8
--- FASSINO Jean-Philippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does someone plain to add the Xpmac server in debian-powerPC ??
> >
> > I doubt it, since that was a somewhat nonstandard server (requires it's
> own
> > kernel config option). Why do you want it? Why not just use XF86_FBDev?
>
> Because,
> > Does someone plain to add the Xpmac server in debian-powerPC ??
> >
> > I doubt it, since that was a somewhat nonstandard server (requires it's own
> > kernel config option). Why do you want it? Why not just use XF86_FBDev?
>
> Because, i want to connect a external monitor on my PB !
> It's wo
> Does someone plain to add the Xpmac server in debian-powerPC ??
>
> I doubt it, since that was a somewhat nonstandard server (requires it's own
> kernel config option). Why do you want it? Why not just use XF86_FBDev?
Because, i want to connect a external monitor on my PB !
It's work with the Xp
18 matches
Mail list logo
