Hi!
> Ugh, in which way, not loadable??
Incorrect statement from my side. It would have better been "thrown out
by apt because of dependencies". I actually don't know if they really
are not loadable, but after apt removes them, they _will_ be unloadable
;-)
bye, Georg
On Thu, Mar 25, 1999 at 07:45:33PM +0100, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> > The new apache in the powerpc directories now breaks the apache modules.
> > Will those be uploaded any time soon? It's not a big problem, but it
> > would actually be nice to have all parts together ;-)
>
> Ugh, in which way, no
On Thu, Mar 25, 1999 at 02:38:34PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> On Tue, 23 Mar 1999, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
>
> >I think it sym-links ../linux -> /usr/src/linux, this may also a link ...
> >This with -I../../port/linux/include -I../../include a
> The new apache in the powerpc directories now breaks the apache modules.
> Will those be uploaded any time soon? It's not a big problem, but it
> would actually be nice to have all parts together ;-)
Ugh, in which way, not loadable??
MfG,
Hartmut
Hi!
The new apache in the powerpc directories now breaks the apache modules.
Will those be uploaded any time soon? It's not a big problem, but it
would actually be nice to have all parts together ;-)
bye, Georg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
>> ipfwadm
will do ipfwchains instead.
>> bind
check separate mail.
>> m4 (this could a little hard, but hey, they are only computer programs!)
done.
>> bash (that seems to be an ldd error on dpkg-shlibdeps, stra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 23 Mar 1999, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
>I think it sym-links ../linux -> /usr/src/linux, this may also a link ...
>This with -I../../port/linux/include -I../../include and you are in trouble.
>
>... and an #include is so easy :-)
check this. It's th
7 matches
Mail list logo
