Re: libc6 Dependency problems

1999-03-13 Thread Randall Barth
Michel and Hartmut- Thanks for the pointer. In general, if I stumble across further dependency problems, is there a central place to look for the pointers to packages not yet included in the official tree? Or is the best thing to ask here? Regards, Randy

Re: libc6 Dependency problems

1999-03-13 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 13-Mär-99, Randall Barth wrote:\n > The question is: How can I get apt-get to ignore the dependencies and > install anyway? Alternatively, can someone determine if the >= 2.1 > dependency is valid and change? or update libc6? You can get glibc 2.1 at http://powerpc.debian.org/~koptein/glibc-

Re: libc6 Dependency problems

1999-03-13 Thread Hartmut Koptein
> In attempting to install on my PowerMac 6500, I've noticed that a lot of > packages depend on libc6 >= 2.1 but the only available version is 2.0.x. > In fact a quick scan of the unstable tree shows 2.1.x only available for > the i386 arch. > > The question is: How can I get apt-get to ignore

libc6 Dependency problems

1999-03-13 Thread Randall Barth
In attempting to install on my PowerMac 6500, I've noticed that a lot of packages depend on libc6 >= 2.1 but the only available version is 2.0.x. In fact a quick scan of the unstable tree shows 2.1.x only available for the i386 arch. The question is: How can I get apt-get to ignore the dependen