unsubscribe
On Sat, Jan 16, 1999 at 10:26:00PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jan 1999, Sven LUTHER wrote:
>
> > I don't understand you, ... first you complain that the gtk package is too
> > old,
> > then you say it is because of a known egcs buug, and there is no solution
> > apart
>
On Sat, 16 Jan 1999, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> I don't understand you, ... first you complain that the gtk package is too
> old,
> then you say it is because of a known egcs buug, and there is no solution
> apart
> from no compiling the test program that cause problem, and then you said it is
> not
On Fri, Jan 15, 1999 at 05:17:52PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, luther sven wrote:
>
> > i think in this case the correct thing to do is to fill a bug against this
> > package, did you do it ?
> > you state there that the package don't compile, because of so and s
On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> OK, it's not schedule-insns2 then. Try a few others if you can find
> them in the docs.
yep, you were right. it's -O -fschedule-insns that causes the bug to
appear.
> 62 lines is great. But, can you grab the bare minimum of the necessary
> defi
On Sat, Jan 16, 1999 at 01:17:39AM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> well, maybe you are right, but I found out that it is part of the problem.
> Removing it removed the bug. And as you can see I have chopped off 99% of
> the code. I could not remove anything more, because whatever I did fixe
6 matches
Mail list logo
