Alex Romosan wrote:
> i think you should mention that the kernel version has to be greater
> than 2.1.102 (not sure about the last digit) because of the
> chown/lchown problem. i spent enough time figuring this out.
done.
Regards,
Joey
--
If you come from outside of Finland, you live i
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I've just reinstalled debian from the base.tar.gz tarball.
> >
> > I had (have) three difficulties: 1) relating to the tarball 2)
> > another because I was installing **over** a redhat/mklinux
> > system, and 3) no editor worked.
> >
> > 1) dselect/dpkg uses awk to
I may be getting a powerbook this week. Anyone care to comment on which
ones work and which dont. No, it wont be a G3 )-:
Joel Klecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It doesn't have powerpc support (of all the emacsen, only xemacs20 has any
> powerpc support). I have patches from the linuxppc SRPMs in my home
> directory on master for emacs 19 and 20.
Well, since I'm the emacs20 maintainer, and I now have a very
conv
i think you should mention that the kernel version has to be greater
than 2.1.102 (not sure about the last digit) because of the
chown/lchown problem. i spent enough time figuring this out.
--alex--
--
| I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active |
| advance of the mind, it
At 23:31 -0700 1998-08-22, Rob Browning wrote:
>Now that might be it. Does kernel-package work right on powerpc these
>days?
Not for kernel-image packages yet. Hartmut Koptein and I sent Manoj patches
for this, but a kernel-package with them hasn't been released yet. Attached
is my diff against k
At 16:52 -0700 1998-08-23, Rob Browning wrote:
>Also, is there some big known problem with emacs20, or should I try to
>work on it?
It doesn't have powerpc support (of all the emacsen, only xemacs20 has any
powerpc support). I have patches from the linuxppc SRPMs in my home
directory on master for
On Sun, Aug 23, 1998 at 05:16:50PM -0700, Matt McLean wrote:
> On 23 Aug 1998, Rob Browning wrote:
>
> >
> > FWIW, I tried to build apt, and it died during the configure stage
> > with an SLang problem. After I hacked configure.in, it got past that
> > stage, but it ends up needing libg++ which
On 23 Aug 1998, Rob Browning wrote:
>
> FWIW, I tried to build apt, and it died during the configure stage
> with an SLang problem. After I hacked configure.in, it got past that
> stage, but it ends up needing libg++ which it looks like isn't
> available yet. Is that a major sticking point righ
9 matches
Mail list logo
