Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.6.2.0
Severity: minor
In the first paragraph of section 7.6.1 "Overwriting files in other
packages" the reason why Breaks should be used when Replaces does is
mentioned in a sentence and explained in a footnote.
I suggest to take that sentence "Normally, Breaks s
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.6.2.0
Severity: normal
Hi,
over at bug #1050027 there is a discussion of applicable policy when
splitting a package. I'll first explain what the bug is about and then
why that's a problem with the Policy.
The src:mathcomp-analysis package provided a single binar
Hi,
Le mercredi 23 août 2023 à 08:45 +0100, Simon McVittie a écrit :
> No, the central misunderstanding here is that you think Replaces will
> have the effect of instructing dpkg to remove the replaced package
> completely, which is not the case.
Oh. I think I had two problems:
(1) thinking "Rep
3 matches
Mail list logo