the dependency tree that require accompanying source.
[2]:
https://git.dpkg.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/commit/?id=16c412439c5eac5f32930946df9006dfc13efc02
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2022/03/msg03007.html
From a9b9c513ae985fddca1bf9cceadce6d3d620ce53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ma
t requires full
source code to be available), would have these fields in its control
file:
::
Built-Using: rust-pulsectl-rs (= 0.3.2-1+b1)
Static-Built-Using: rust-gtk4 (= 0.7.3-3), rust-pulsectl-rs (= 0.3.2-1+b1)
--
Kind regards,
Maytham
From 06cf64756ff1ee66d845e86dcf5c9dafd4a84b39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
https://bugs.debian.org/1069256
(Note that the patch has been revised, the patch attached to the first message
is not the one currently being proposed.)
Thanks,
Maytham
PS: I'm around on IRC in #debian-(rust|golang|devel) if you want to discuss.
On Sat, 2024-04-27 at 17:40 +0800, Maytham Alsu
Hi,
Ping for further feedback or seconds for proposed policy change to
clarify and document the use of the Static-Built-Using field.
On Sat, 2024-04-27 at 17:40 +0800, Maytham Alsudany wrote:
> Thanks for your input and suggestions. I've attached an updated patch with
> seve
Hi,
Ping for further feedback or seconds for proposed policy change to
clarify and document the use of the Static-Built-Using field.
On Sat, 2024-04-27 at 17:40 +0800, Maytham Alsudany wrote:
> Thanks for your input and suggestions. I've attached an updated patch with
> seve
On Tue, 2024-09-24 at 20:32 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 at 23:45:30 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Sat, 2024-04-27 at 17:40:49 +0800, Maytham Alsudany wrote:
> > > +A package statically linked with the libraries contained in the
> > > +l
it, once it has
> seen some wordsmithing. :)
Please review the revised patch that is attached when you can.
Thanks!
--
Maytham Alsudany
Debian Maintainer
maytham @ OFTC
maytha8 @ Libera
From 10783df49d99e48d3f7d2b528d216d005b19ba8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maytham Alsudany
Date: Th
Hi Simon,
On Mon, 2025-02-03 at 13:32 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
[...]
> Maybe adding an example for embedded static C object code like this
> would help clarify the intention.
Would adding the following after the first paragraph be sufficient in
your view?
Note that you do not need to lis
Hi Simon,
On Mon, 2025-03-03 at 11:58 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I believe the phrase
>
>"does not directly incorporate the contents"
>
> still leaves room for ambiguity though. Certaintly to some way of
> reading "foo" WILL incorporate the particular bits coming from "baz"
> directly,
9 matches
Mail list logo
