On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 01:33:08AM +, James Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 12:05:18AM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 01:39:45PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:31:52PM +0100, Balint Reczey wrote:
> > > > On 06/04/2014 03:41 AM,
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 02:49:04PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Hi,
>
> dak and https://wiki.debian.org/RepositoryFormat seem to disagree on the
> definition of the Valid-Until field. dak writes "UTC" as the timezone into
> the Release file, where the repository format references policy 4.4 but
>
Package: debian-policy
Severity: normal
APT's solver is greedy and sometimes has a hard time to recover from paths that
don't work out in the end. We see this with opencv failing to build on
!linux-any
because:
(1) dconf-service depends default-dbus-session-bus | dbus-session-bus
(2) default-dbu
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 06:03:43PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 at 18:12:29 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > (1) dconf-service depends default-dbus-session-bus | dbus-session-bus
> > (2) default-dbus-session-bus is provided by an Architecture: all pa
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:02:21AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>
> > APT's solver is greedy and sometimes has a hard time to recover from paths
> > that
> > don't work out in the end. We see this with opencv failing
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:47:56AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 at 11:54:49 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:02:21AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > > This is made especially difficult because since policy 4.0.1.0 we a
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
(more of a discussion for now)
6 years ago we started working on documenting the repository format
in the wiki[1] with the goal of making it a sub policy. I have not
done any work on converting it.
Should we move forward now with turning it into a policy
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 07:04:10PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 08:42:11PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> I do feel like allowing either based on the whim of the packager is just
> >> kind of bad. It produces inconsistent behavi
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:03:01AM +0800, Allen wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 1.2.19
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>
> I am creating a deb packages which will replace another package. And before
> the
> old package are removed, I want to check whether the package is remove due to
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 09:23:00AM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> Source: debian-policy
> Version: 4.5.1.0
> Severity: wishlist
>
> In Julian Andres Klode's blog I've [1] glimpsed:
>
> > New features
> > [...]
> > The Protected field is now supported. It replaces the previous Important
> > field
300, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--
Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member
See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndr
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.8.0.1
Severity: minor
Quoting 3.9.1:
"Packages which use the Debian Configuration management specification must
allow for trans-
lation of their messages by using a gettext-based system such as the one
provided by the
po-debconf package."
But internal debconf q
Joey Hess wrote:
> Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>> Quoting 3.9.1:
>> "Packages which use the Debian Configuration management specification must
>> allow for trans-
>> lation of their messages by using a gettext-based system such as the one
>> provided by
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Joey Hess wrote:
>>> Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>
>>>> Quoting 3.9.1:
>
>>>> "Packages which use the Debian Configuration management specification
>>>&g
in/sh linked to /bin/dash
debian-policy depends on no packages.
debian-policy recommends no packages.
Versions of packages debian-policy suggests:
ii doc-base 0.9.2 utilities to manage online documen
-- no debconf information
--
Julian Andres Klode - Free Sof
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:04:21AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 05:01:46PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > Therefore, I propose to change the requirement so that all packages must
> > support /var/run/ and /var/lock/ on temporary filesystems, and not
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: de...@lists.debian.org, debian-d...@lists.debian.org
APT's installation planner does not consider dependencies of packages
being scheduled for removal, so a prerm must fail equally gracefully
as a postrm does in absence of its dependencies.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 10:54:53AM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 4.7.0.2
> Severity: minor
> X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@debian.org, ftpmas...@debian.org
>
> I like to propose roughly the following changes, to bring
> the specification of
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:08:55PM +, Sean Whitton wrote:
> control: tag -1 + wontfix
>
> Hello,
>
> The existing text you're removing was carefully worked out with
> ftpmaster to try to reduce the burden on maintainers.
> Just deleting it would be a clear step backwards.
That may well be bu
preserved.
>From 45a1d775788380b5e260c0be7f91cd362b4dde3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julian Andres Klode
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:44:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Change d/copyright requirements to reflect reality
Remove the need to only preserve copyright information required
to be retained b
20 matches
Mail list logo
