Bug#682347: mark 'editor' virtual package name as obsolete

rs to adapt. I think the editor virtual package adds some value and completing coverage of all package should be easy and completion can be encouraged via a release goal or something similar. Let me know what the outcome is and I'll adapt nano right away. Jordi -- Jordi Mallach

Re: 'editor' alternative policy?

s to any rationale. Should there be policy for this, as for x-w-m? -- Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Rediscovering Freedom, aka Oskuro in|| [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Using Debian GNU/Linux Reinos de Leyenda || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || http://debian.org http://sindom

Re: 'editor' alternative policy?

o penalize non-free editors automatically, for example. Or give more importance to i18n support, or whatever. Anyway, at the least, we should have the file you suggest with current priorities. Jordi -- Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Rediscovering Freedom, aka Oskuro in|| [EMAI

Re: All services that require a restart from libc6 upgrade...

On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 07:04:44PM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote: > > > The processes to restart could be taken from ps AND /etc/init.d/*. > > This only works under Linux (/proc usage). > Debian does not ship any other kernel... People are trying to... -- Jordi Malla