Has the self-service wannabuild giveback script been disabled?
It's now rejecting connections, e.g.
https://buildd.debian.org/auth/giveback.cgi?pkg=ga&suite=sid&arch=armel
generates
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access this resource.Reason: Cannot
perform Post-Handshake Authenti
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.6.0.0
Severity: normal
The upgrading-checklist at
/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz
was not upgraded correctly for 4.6.0.0.
It references Version 4.5.2 instead.
I'm packaging viewmol, a program for visualising molecules, used in
computational chemistry.
The question arises, what subsection should it be put into?
A comparable program, rasmol, is already in debian, in the math subsection.
But computational chemistry is not, strictly speaking, mathematics (i
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 07:03:51PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > > I'm packaging viewmol, a program for visualising molecules, used in
> > > computational chemistry.
> > >
> > > The question arises, what subsection should it be put into?
> > > A comparable program, rasmol, is already in debian,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 08:32:23PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 10:54:45PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Seems to me there's still a gaping hole in policy though. Is
> > packages.debian.org really supposed to be the definitive arbiter of policy
> >
n.d
instead to achieve the desired result for all X clients.
Just a little more food for though :)
Drew Parsons
--
PGP public key available at http://people.debian.org/~dparsons/drewskey.txt
Fingerprint: A110 EAE1 D7D2 8076 5FE0 EC0A B6CE 7041 6412 4E4A
pgpbAMQu60v5p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.7.0.0
Severity: normal
Latest policy still says in 11.8.7 "Packages must not provide or install
files into the directories /usr/bin/X11/, /usr/include/X11/ or
/usr/lib/X11/."
But the new X11R7 dev packages now generally put their headers into
/usr/include/X11/.
On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 15:12 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Yes, policy definitely needs to be amended to reflect these changes in
> X11R7. I don't have time to propose a formal policy amendment right now;
> Drew, perhaps you would be willing to synthesize the above information into
> one?
Yeah,
8 matches
Mail list logo
