Policy proposal: Cpu extension code, update-ldsoconf

2001-06-25 Thread Camm Maguire
path need not be added, and can be removed, if no libs exist in the directory. Comments most welcome, but please cc me directly, as I'm not subscribed to some of these lists. Thanks for your work on Debian! -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL

Re: Policy proposal: Cpu extension code, update-ldsoconf

2001-06-26 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Michel LESPINASSE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 03:16:27PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote: > > Greetings! This is hardly formal, but it seems as though we don't > > have a policy on this yet, and a number of packages are appearing > &

Bug#120418: Policy proposal: Cpu extension code

2001-11-27 Thread Camm Maguire
iners > will need subarchitecture-specific build rules anyway, to enable the > various CISEs, so the cost of adding special-case -fPIC handling is > not very big actually. > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 07:24:29PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > > Greetings! I posted this proposa