Re: PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?)

2016-08-22 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi All, 2016-05-28 23:16 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey : > Hi, > > 2016-05-18 2:21 GMT+02:00 Guillem Jover : >> On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 12:08:09 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> I'm not a fan myself for turning on hardening flags in the compiler itself, >>> but if yo

Bug#837478: Static libraries - PIC or PIE?

2016-10-23 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Adrian, 2016-10-23 13:26 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk : > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:29:42PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> Hi Ardian, > > Hi Bláint, ;-) I'm sorry. :-) > >> 2016-10-23 10:18 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk : >> > Hi Bálint, >> > >> >

Bug#837478: Static libraries - PIC or PIE?

2016-10-31 Thread Bálint Réczey
2016-10-23 16:06 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk : > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 03:17:06PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> Hi Adrian, >> >> 2016-10-23 13:26 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk : >> > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:29:42PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> >> Hi Ardian

Re: Re: Bug#748936: apt doesnt understand architecture wildcards

2016-01-20 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi, 2016-01-20 14:39 GMT+01:00 Colin Watson : > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:31:52PM +0100, Balint Reczey wrote: >> On 06/04/2014 03:41 AM, Guillem Jover wrote: >> > * Other programs could “easily” use dpkg-architecture to check for >> >identity or a match. (This poses problems for programs tha

Re: Re: Bug#748936: apt doesnt understand architecture wildcards

2016-01-21 Thread Bálint Réczey
2016-01-20 15:12 GMT+01:00 Bálint Réczey : > Hi, > > 2016-01-20 14:39 GMT+01:00 Colin Watson : >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:31:52PM +0100, Balint Reczey wrote: >>> On 06/04/2014 03:41 AM, Guillem Jover wrote: >>> > * Other programs could “easily

PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?)

2016-05-15 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi, 2016-05-15 4:11 GMT+02:00 Dimitri John Ledkov : > On 14 May 2016 at 21:12, Niels Thykier wrote: >> Marco d'Itri: >>> On May 03, Josh Triplett wrote: >>> While this doesn't make PIC absolutely free, it does eliminate almost all of the cost, to the point that it no longer seems worth

Re: PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?)

2016-05-15 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Niels, 2016-05-15 20:49 GMT+02:00 Niels Thykier : > Bálint Réczey: >> Hi, >> >> [...] >> > > Hi, > >> I think making PIE and bindnow default in dpkg (at least for amd64) would be >> perfect release goals for Stretch. >> > > I support

Re: PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?)

2016-05-28 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi, 2016-05-18 2:21 GMT+02:00 Guillem Jover : > On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 12:08:09 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >> I'm not a fan myself for turning on hardening flags in the compiler itself, >> but if you do that, then dpkg issues like https://bugs.debian.org/823869 >> need to be addressed (whether al