On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:24 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Riccardo Stagni writes:
>
> > I thing that this issue became more serious with the lintian-based
> > automatic rejection of incoming packages.
> > Some days ago an upload (illuminator_0.11.0-4_amd64.changes) got rejected
> > because of this
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.1.1.1
Severity: wishlist
I'd like to recommend a change in policy regarding "examples" (section
6.7), such that source code and shell scripts must either live in
/usr/share/doc/package-name/examples, or (here's the change) if the
package name ends in (or contains?
Camm Maguire wrote:
2) This library should be placed in a designated subdir of /usr/lib
specialized for code requiring the cpu extension in question. All
such directories should be agreed on and sanctioned by the policy
committee. As a suggestion, the directory might be named after
the
3 matches
Mail list logo
