On Sat, Jan 04, 2025 at 12:54:20PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> * Bill Allombert [250104 12:21]:
> > > > Secondly, I just found a package that fails if /usr/share/doc is
> > > > removed, so I wonder how far we can actually validate this.
> > >
> > > We've had that restriction in place for a
control: tag -1 + pending
Hello,
On Tue 31 Dec 2024 at 06:00pm +01, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 01:33:58PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> > What is a graceful failure for some script is a crash for another...
>>
>> I would be happy to reduce the expectations of the language h
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + pending
Bug #1089110 [debian-policy] [PATCH] Document that packages cannot require man
/ info / locale files
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1089110: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1089110
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.o
Hello,
On Sat 04 Jan 2025 at 05:20pm +08, Maytham Alsudany wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-08-21 at 23:45 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
>>
>> > +A package that needs domain name suffix data from the publicsuffix
>> > +binary package would list it in the ``Static-Built-Using`` field like
>> > +so:
>>
>> Perha
debian-policy 4.7.0.1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2025-01-18
It is affected by these RC bugs:
1087626: debian-policy: Please support building the binaries without requiring
fakeroot
https://bugs.debian.org/1087626
For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints
* Bill Allombert [250104 12:21]:
> > > Secondly, I just found a package that fails if /usr/share/doc is
> > > removed, so I wonder how far we can actually validate this.
> >
> > We've had that restriction in place for a long time, so that package is
> > just buggy, I think.
>
> Precisely, the pa
On Sat, Jan 04, 2025 at 10:28:55AM +, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > For /usr/share/doc/$pkg, it is easy to move the files to /usr/share/$pkg.
>
> I don't think that would be a good fix in most cases.
Maybe or maybe not in the majority of case, but at least this is simple enough
to do on the packagi
On Tue, 2024-09-24 at 20:32 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 at 23:45:30 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Sat, 2024-04-27 at 17:40:49 +0800, Maytham Alsudany wrote:
> > > +A package statically linked with the libraries contained in the
> > > +librust-gtk4-dev and librust-pulsect
Hi,
Most of the problems with wording have been fixed, except for the one I
note below.
On Wed, 2024-08-21 at 23:45 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
>
> > +A package that needs domain name suffix data from the publicsuffix
> > +binary package would list it in the ``Static-Built-Using`` field like
> >
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1069256 + patch
Bug #1069256 [debian-policy] debian-policy: clarify requirement for use of
Static-Built-Using
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1069256: https://bugs.debian.
10 matches
Mail list logo
