Dmitry Bogatov writes:
> [2019-09-28 18:02] Russ Allbery
>> I agree. This seems entirely reasonable to me. Both the behavior and the
>> inherent documentation are better with unit files, and systemd is the
>> default init system so that's an advantage for a lot of our users.
>>
>> That said, if a
On Fri, 01 Nov 2019 at 12:21:43 +0100, Ansgar wrote:
> Dmitry Bogatov writes:
> > Does it mean that lack of systemd unit file is RC-critical bug? Or I
> > will be able to waive it with "you are welcome to contribute a patch"
> > response?
I think in general the answer is that it should be a non-RC
Ansgar writes:
> How to proceed with this? Do you still require any wording changes?
I think we can proceed to add a Policy "should" for including a systemd
unit file unless someone raises objections pretty soon here. So far, I
haven't seen any objections to the basic idea.
> Or should we con
Russ Allbery writes:
> Ansgar writes:
>> How to proceed with this? Do you still require any wording changes?
>
> I think we can proceed to add a Policy "should" for including a systemd
> unit file unless someone raises objections pretty soon here. So far, I
> haven't seen any objections to the b
Ansgar writes:
> Russ Allbery writes:
>> Ansgar writes:
>> I think we can proceed to add a Policy "should" for including a systemd
>> unit file unless someone raises objections pretty soon here. So far, I
>> haven't seen any objections to the basic idea.
> Okay. Anything further I should do e
5 matches
Mail list logo
