Bug#941803: debian-policy: dependencies on font packages

Stephen Kitt writes: > Is the following suitable? Yup, this looks great. Seconded. Once this gets one more second, we'll apply it. > From d5895ca185fa1d678a098697d9e1c601c84f45dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Stephen Kitt > Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 21:09:52 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] Allow str

Bug#941803: debian-policy: dependencies on font packages

On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 12:13:00PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > From d5895ca185fa1d678a098697d9e1c601c84f45dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Stephen Kitt > > Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 21:09:52 +0200 > > Subject: [PATCH] Allow strong dependencies on X font packages > > > The X server shipped in

Processed: Re: Bug#941803: debian-policy: dependencies on font packages

Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #941803 [debian-policy] debian-policy: dependencies on font packages Added tag(s) pending. -- 941803: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941803 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#941803: debian-policy: dependencies on font packages

Control: tags -1 pending Russ Allbery writes: > Stephen Kitt writes: >> Is the following suitable? > Yup, this looks great. Seconded. Once this gets one more second, we'll > apply it. And now applied for the next release. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)

Bug#941194: initscripts: remove some implementation details

Sean Whitton writes: > On Thu 26 Sep 2019 at 09:01AM +02, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> Control: reassign -1 debian-policy >> >> The section on initscripts has too much implementation details about >> /etc/rcn.d; these are better explained by external documentation. > Are you saying that they are *

Bug#941835: debian-policy: drop mentioning of legacy manual in package description

Control: tags -1 pending Holger Levsen writes: > the current package description contains this paragraph: > It also replaces the old Packaging Manual; most of the still-relevant > content is now included as appendices to the Policy Manual. > I'm around a long time and I dont remember the old

Processed: Re: Bug#941835: debian-policy: drop mentioning of legacy manual in package description

Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #941835 [debian-policy] debian-policy: drop mentioning of legacy manual in package description Added tag(s) pending. -- 941835: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941835 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wi

Bug#941803: debian-policy: dependencies on font packages

On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:55:41 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Russ Allbery writes: > > Stephen Kitt writes: > > >> Is the following suitable? > > > Yup, this looks great. Seconded. Once this gets one more second, we'll > > apply it. > > And now applied for the next release. Great, thanks

Processed: Re: Please document Haskell team style Vcs-Git sytax

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #932696 [debian-policy] Please document Haskell team style Vcs-Git sytax Added tag(s) patch. -- 932696: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932696 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#932696: Please document Haskell team style Vcs-Git sytax

Control: tags -1 patch Ian Jackson writes: > I found myself trying to implement what I had suggested earlier and > ran up against the question of what to do about [ ] in optional > values. > I decided to use this regexp > + $vcsgiturl =~ s/\s+\[[^][]*\]//g; > (I need to strip the informatio

Bug#941194: initscripts: remove some implementation details

Russ Allbery writes: > I'm hesitant to remove all discussion of run levels because package > maintainers are still responsible for choosing a run level at which to > start their service and providing that run level as an argument to > update-rc.d. No, maintainer scripts call `update-rc.d defaults

Bug#941194: initscripts: remove some implementation details

Ansgar writes: > Russ Allbery writes: >> I'm hesitant to remove all discussion of run levels because package >> maintainers are still responsible for choosing a run level at which to >> start their service and providing that run level as an argument to >> update-rc.d. > No, maintainer scripts ca

Bug#941194: [PATCH 2/2] refer to external documentation for implementation details of /etc/rcn.d

Seconded. Super-minor punctuation nit below for whoever applies this patch. Ansgar writes: > --- > policy/ch-opersys.rst | 65 --- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) > diff --git a/policy/ch-opersys.rst b/policy/ch-opersys.rst > index 1

Bug#932696: Please document Haskell team style Vcs-Git sytax

> +In the case of Git, the value must have the following syntax:: > + > + [ " -b " ] [ "[" "]" ] That should be " [" (including a leading space). > + > +where the portions enclosed in brackets are optional and the portions > +enclosed in double quotes are literal strings.

Bug#932696: Please document Haskell team style Vcs-Git sytax

Ansgar writes: >> +In the case of Git, the value must have the following syntax:: >> + >> + [ " -b " ] [ "[" "]" ] > That should be " [" (including a leading space). Yup, indeed, thanks! > I suggest something like "If is not specified, it defaults to `.` > (or `debian`; see belo

debian-policy is marked for autoremoval from testing

debian-policy 4.4.1.1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2019-11-23 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 885271: dia-common: Depends on unmaintained pygtk