Processed: Bug#550283 marked as pending in developers-reference

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #550283 [developers-reference] devref: §5.3. - clarify to install and test on an up-to-date unstable system Added tag(s) pending. -- 550283: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=550283 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.d

Processing of developers-reference_11.0.4_source.changes

developers-reference_11.0.4_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: developers-reference_11.0.4.dsc developers-reference_11.0.4.tar.xz developers-reference_11.0.4_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#731666: marked as done (suggest to think about testing before uploading to unstable.)

Your message dated Sat, 05 Oct 2019 08:34:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#731666: fixed in developers-reference 11.0.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #731666, regarding suggest to think about testing before uploading to unstable. to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#550283: marked as done (devref: §5.3. - clarify to install and test on an up-to-date unstable system)

Your message dated Sat, 05 Oct 2019 08:34:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#550283: fixed in developers-reference 11.0.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #550283, regarding devref: §5.3. - clarify to install and test on an up-to-date unstable system to be marked as done. This means t

Bug#931743: marked as done (developers-reference: Improve documentation for stable updates (5.5.1))

Your message dated Sat, 05 Oct 2019 08:34:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#931743: fixed in developers-reference 11.0.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #931743, regarding developers-reference: Improve documentation for stable updates (5.5.1) to be marked as done. This means that you

developers-reference_11.0.4_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2019 09:54:32 +0200 Source: developers-reference Architecture: source Version: 11.0.4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Developers Reference Maintainers Changed-By: Holger Levsen Closes:

Bug#658825: Provide *single* page HTML manuals in http://www.debian.org/doc/*

On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 09:25:57PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 09:07:41PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > > fwiw, src:developers-reference/Makefile now contains these lines: > > > > # singlehtml files > > # don't install Sphinx singlehtml output until variou

Bug#658825: Provide *single* page HTML manuals in http://www.debian.org/doc/*

On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 12:12:55PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > the comments are outdated, all these three bugs have been fixed in the > > meantime... > Does that mean the singlehtml version can be restored ? > Does this apply to debian-policy too ? I've no idea, I just noticed these bugs are

Processed: why #318637? "Recommend that -dev documents be symlinks"

Processing control commands: > tags -1 wontfix Bug #318637 [developers-reference] Recommend that -dev documents be symlinks Added tag(s) wontfix. -- 318637: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=318637 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#318637: why #318637? "Recommend that -dev documents be symlinks"

control: tags -1 wontfix thanks hi, in 2005 manoj wrote to this bug "BTW, _why_ are these -dev packages duplicating files already in a package they depend on?" and I have to say, I'm wondering the same and don't think this is true anymore, so I'm tagging this wontfix. Please correct me if I'm wro

Processed: why #318637? "Recommend that -dev documents be symlinks"

Processing control commands: > tags -1 wontfix Bug #318637 [developers-reference] Recommend that -dev documents be symlinks Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #318637 to the same tags previously set -- 318637: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=318637 Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#852523: marked as done (Central section common to (old)stable and (old)stable-security regarding versioning recommendations)

Your message dated Sat, 5 Oct 2019 13:54:21 + with message-id <20191005135421.xhsy5rkazg4io...@layer-acht.org> and subject line re: #852523: devref: Central section common to (old)stable and (old)stable-security regarding versioning recommendations has caused the Debian Bug report #852523, reg

Processed: Bug#541956 marked as pending in developers-reference

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #541956 [developers-reference] Fw: t-p-u description in dev-ref Added tag(s) pending. -- 541956: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541956 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: info given

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 878967 -moreinfo Bug #878967 [developers-reference] State intended audience of debian/changelog Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 878967: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug

Bug#896015: marked as done (developers-reference: Changes to conventions for uploading to stable-proposed-updates)

Your message dated Sat, 5 Oct 2019 14:37:59 + with message-id <20191005143758.iqgmkwja3kbpu...@layer-acht.org> and subject line this conventation change has already been documented has caused the Debian Bug report #896015, regarding developers-reference: Changes to conventions for uploading to

Bug#932704: debian-policy: Don't force sysvinit compatibility if e.g. alternate init required

Hello David, On Sun 29 Sep 2019 at 10:35AM -04, David Steele wrote: > On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 1:05 PM Sean Whitton wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> On Sat 28 Sep 2019 at 04:18PM +00, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: >> >> > Reasonable. Then let's drop part about Depends: >> > >> > [ ... All packages with da

Bug#941194: initscripts: remove some implementation details

Hello, On Sun 29 Sep 2019 at 10:21AM +02, Ansgar wrote: > I think README.runlevels documents everything about how rcn.d scripts > are called that Policy also documents (at least the part removed in my > diff). Okay, thanks for the feedback. It would be good to have a third party review the othe

Processed (with 1 error): pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 548116 + pending Bug #548116 [developers-reference] developers-reference: Section 3.7 - insert a reminder to retire from teams Added tag(s) pending. > fixed in git in d69074a9d6f6a2c8ad3c14e205b61bc91fb94ade Unknown command or malformed argum

Processed: Bug#470960 marked as pending in developers-reference

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #470960 [developers-reference] 6.7.8.2: point 4 (use foo-ver.orig for repacked tarballs) seems backwards Added tag(s) pending. -- 470960: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=470960 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debi

Bug#941803: debian-policy: dependencies on font packages

Package: debian-policy Version: 4.4.1.1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Policy section 11.8.5, point 1 says > If one or more of the fonts so packaged are necessary for proper > operation of the package with which they are associated the font > package may be Recommended; if the fonts merely pr

Bug#483240: marked as done (developers-reference: Section A.4.2 - mention other SCM-buildpackages)

Your message dated Sat, 5 Oct 2019 19:54:04 + with message-id <20191005195404.ymfhl6mjk635i...@layer-acht.org> and subject line re: #483240: developers-reference: Section A.4.2 - mention other SCM-buildpackagess has caused the Debian Bug report #483240, regarding developers-reference: Section

Bug#941803: debian-policy: dependencies on font packages

On Sat, 05 Oct 2019 21:44:25 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: > Policy section 11.8.5, point 1 says > > > If one or more of the fonts so packaged are necessary for proper > > operation of the package with which they are associated the font > > package may be Recommended; if the fonts merely provide an

Bug#399028: developers-reference: best practices to create and delete system accounts

Hi Marc, On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 09:41:48AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > The information collected in > http://wiki.debian.org/AccountHandlingInMaintainerScripts should > eventually be put into the developer's reference, chapter 6.5. would you suggest to remove all of that from this wiki page and

Processed: Bug#483235 marked as pending in developers-reference

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #483235 [developers-reference] developers-reference: Section 8.3.2 - mention to use even tag "l10n" Added tag(s) pending. -- 483235: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=483235 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or

Processed: forcemerge

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 823584 470960 Bug #823584 [developers-reference] Correct top-level directory name in repackaged tarballs Bug #470960 [developers-reference] 6.7.8.2: point 4 (use foo-ver.orig for repacked tarballs) seems backwards Marked as found in v

Processed: Bug#754189 marked as pending in developers-reference

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #754189 [developers-reference] developers-reference: describe maintenance workflow for developers-reference Added tag(s) pending. -- 754189: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754189 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.d

Bug#932704: debian-policy: Don't force sysvinit compatibility if e.g. alternate init required

On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 1:06 PM Sean Whitton wrote: > > Hello David, > > On Sun 29 Sep 2019 at 10:35AM -04, David Steele wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 1:05 PM Sean Whitton > > wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> On Sat 28 Sep 2019 at 04:18PM +00, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > >> > >> > Reasonable.