On വെള്ളി 02 മാർച്ച് 2018 09:57 വൈകു, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I generally read team policies with an implicit "...as long as it
> doesn't conflict with the general Debian Policy".
>
> Specifically, I read the "should" in above quote as "in most cases, but
> not a "must".
>
> We have in the Ja
Pirate Praveen wrote:
> md5sum /usr/share/javascript/backbone/backbone.js
> /usr/lib/nodejs/backbone/index.js
> 8a8d829617513f36185a0ab055d088ec
> /usr/share/javascript/backbone/backbone.js
> 8a8d829617513f36185a0ab055d088ec /usr/lib/nodejs/backbone/index.js
except
lrwxrwxrwx … /usr/lib/nodejs
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.1.3.0
Severity: minor
In Policy 7.1. Syntax of relationship fields, there is an example:
For example, a list of dependencies might appear as:
Package: mutt
Version: 1.3.17-1
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.1), exim | mail-transport-agent
I would like to sugg
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 892142 + patch
Bug #892142 [debian-policy] debian-policy: update example to use default-mta
instead of exim
Added tag(s) patch.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
892142: https://bugs.debian.org/c
tags 892142 + patch
quit
Hi,
Paul Wise wrote:
> In Policy 7.1. Syntax of relationship fields, there is an example:
>
>For example, a list of dependencies might appear as:
>
>Package: mutt
>Version: 1.3.17-1
>Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.1), exim | mail-transport-agent
>
> I would like
On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 17:12 -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> How about this patch?
Looks good to me.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
6 matches
Mail list logo
