Hi,
Robert Luberda wrote:
> Please explicitly state in the Policy if linking
> /usr/share/doc/arch:any_package to ../arch:all_package
> (where arch:any_package and arch:all_package come
> from the same source package) is allowed or not.
It currently is not allowed.
[...]
> In my opinion, as
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
I wanted to separate user-level data (for special RAID, backups,
encryption and
such) from system data on my machine, so I targeted /home and /srv. I
found out
that data managed by system services are being stored in
/var/lib/
when I
Afif Elghraoui writes:
> I wanted to separate user-level data (for special RAID, backups,
> encryption and such) from system data on my machine, so I targeted /home
> and /srv. I found out that data managed by system services are being
> stored in /var/lib/ when I expected them to be in /srv and
Hello,
On الثلاثاء 13 كانون الثاني 2015 19:50, Russ Allbery wrote:
I'm afraid that you're misreading the FHS. It actually*prohibits* the
distribution from doing what you want and using /srv by default.
This is the important part of the /srv description for this purpose:
The methodology
Afif Elghraoui writes:
> Thanks for the clarification-- I mistakenly thought this meant that the
> distribution could define its own directory structure there.
Yeah, I totally understand how you could get that impression.
Unfortunately, the FHS isn't horribly clear on who the actors are at
vario
Forgot to reply-all and include the bug address...
رسالة ممرّرة
الموضوع: Re: Bug#775318: debian-policy: Using /srv instead of /var/lib
for served user-level data
التاريخ:Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:21:30 -0800
مِن:Afif Elghraoui
إلى:Russ Allbery
On الثلاثاء 13 ك
6 matches
Mail list logo
