Processed: retitle 609935 to debian-policy: 5.2 should clarify how Homepage from the source and binary packages relate

2014-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 609935 debian-policy: 5.2 should clarify how Homepage from the source > and binary packages relate Bug #609935 [debian-policy] debian-policy: 5.2 should clarify how Hompage from the source and binary packages relate Changed Bug title to

Processed: retitle 686143 to debian-policy: FHS requirements on "essential" binaries cannot be well defined at distro level

2014-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 686143 debian-policy: FHS requirements on "essential" binaries cannot > be well defined at distro level Bug #686143 [debian-policy] debian-policy: FHS requirements on "essential" binaries cannot be well, defined at distro level Changed B

Bug#459427: changelog vs. NEWS handling

2014-11-20 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 02:55:00PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > There is some lack of clarity in the policy or perhaps some confusion among > packagers and thence inconsistencies among packages regarding the handling of > upstream changelog files. Policy says that upstream changelogs should be

Bug#666726: debian-policy: Clarify if empty control fields are ollowed or not

2014-11-20 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Control: tags -1 + patch On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 11:19:15AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > How about the attached patch, that adds "Its value must not be empty." > after "The field ends at the end of the line or at the end of the last > continuation line". Seconded. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc

Processed: Re: Bug#666726: debian-policy: Clarify if empty control fields are ollowed or not

2014-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #666726 [debian-policy] debian-policy: Clarify if empty control fields are allowed or not Added tag(s) patch. -- 666726: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666726 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl

Bug#459427: changelog vs. NEWS handling

2014-11-20 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Peter Eisentraut , 2008-01-06, 14:55: I think that installing a source-level change list is hardly ever useful for a binary package. It's normally more useful that no changelog at all. :-) What I tend to do in my packages is: if user-level change list exists: install it as /usr/shar

Bug#666726: debian-policy: Clarify if empty control fields are ollowed or not

2014-11-20 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:23:17AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin a écrit : > Control: tags -1 + patch > > On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 11:19:15AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > How about the attached patch, that adds "Its value must not be empty." > > after "The field ends at the end of the line or at th

autobuilder network

2014-11-20 Thread kobe24_lixiang
Hi, Here are a few questions about autobuilder network need your help, thanks. Success: I have successfully configured autobuilder network environment on the local machine, wanna-build, buildd and sbuild are on the same machine. Use trigger.local generates data inserted into the table 'packag