On Tue, 21 May 2013, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> In #685646 the advise for versioning for {stable,testing}{,-security}
> uploads was adjusted. In [1] there is a missing bit for it refering to
> the older convention +codename1. I tried to address this change in
> attached patch.
Thanks, applied.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #developers-reference (3.4.11) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Update versioning advice for security uploads as well. Closes: #709218
> #Thanks to Salvatore Bonaccorso for the patch.
> #
> limit source developers-reference
Limiting to bugs
Sune Vuorela dixit:
>The handling of built-using is wrong. It is not meant to encode the
>compiler used, nor binutils or kernel headers should be recorded there
Policy 3.9.4 ยง7.8 says:
Some binary packages incorporate parts of other packages when built
but do not have to depend on thos
Thorsten Glaser writes:
> In this specific case, there are one to two statically linked programs
> there. In some cases, they link statically against a GPL licenced
> library. So my current interpretation of the text from Policy above says
> that Built-Using is indeed required there.
Per previou
4 matches
Mail list logo
