Nu es, saprotams, neiesaku Tev uz Kubu lidot..

2012-01-09 Thread Galkalne Ida
Čau! Patīk lieliski izskatīties, bet šausmina, ka tev jāparmaksā dubultā? Lietotas dērbes arī īsti nepatīk? Neuztraucies: vai nu dodies uz Vāciju iepirkšanās tūrē, vai arī.. apskati to: http://www.paritet.kz/administrator/cache/last.php Lielas atlaides un tiešām oriģināls piedāvājums!

Bug#431109: [PROPOSAL] Disambiguate of Section 12.5

2012-01-09 Thread Charles Plessy
By January 2012, there are still more than 7,000 binary packages whose copyright file refers to a versionless symlink, according to the Lintian page http://lintian.debian.org/tags/copyright-refers-to-symlink-license.html Le Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 11:20:40AM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit : > > For tho

Processed: summary 431109 126

2012-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > summary 431109 126 Bug #431109 [debian-policy] Deprecate use of GPL/LGPL/GFDL symlinks Bug #497470 [debian-policy] Discourage references to unversioned common licenses Summary recorded from message bug 431109 message 126 Summary recorded from mess

Bug#629530: developers-reference: PDF code example has wrong U+2019 for '

2012-01-09 Thread David Prévot
Hi, > Le 07/06/2011 08:56, Osamu Aoki a écrit : >> TeX backend (specifically pdflatex) used to create this PDF is the >> cause. > >> If you move this build this with XeTeX (specifically xelatex), this >> problem goes away. Indeed, I just rebuilt it with XeTeX and it works: http://people.debia

Appendix G - Diversions typo

2012-01-09 Thread Slavko
Hi all, i am reading the Policy Manual, the part about diversions and i found one typo, when in the postrm example (and before too) is mentioned "1.0-2" version number, but in description of this number is "1.02-2" mentioned: - if [ abort-upgrade = "$1" ] && dpkg --compare-version

Bug#649530: [copyright-format] clearer definitions and more consistent License: stanza specification

2012-01-09 Thread Ximin Luo
On 08/01/12 05:30, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 03:22:04PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Ximin Luo wrote: > >>> OK, understood. I will take a look at creating a patch for >>> copyright-format.xml >>> like you did. However, I think I would prefer using an explicit grammar >>

Re: Appendix G - Diversions typo

2012-01-09 Thread Russ Allbery
Slavko writes: > i am reading the Policy Manual, the part about diversions and i found > one typo, when in the postrm example (and before too) is mentioned > "1.0-2" version number, but in description of this number is "1.02-2" > mentioned: > - > if [ abort-upgrade = "$1" ] && dp

Bug#629530: developers-reference: PDF code example has wrong U+2019 for '

2012-01-09 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Mon, 09 Jan 2012, David Prévot wrote: > As you may have noticed, the English document looks different: I quickly > copied and pasted part of the maint-guide build system (the xslt > directory is directly copied from there, and probably needs to be > adapted to keep the current look), in ord