The biggest and largest luxury store for shoes and bags is just one click away.
Recommended by thousands of satisfied customers worldwide, we carry dozens of
famous brands including:
Hermes
Adidas
Chanel Shoes
Paul Smith
Prada Shoes
Here you willc find hundred thousands of best design
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 489135 developers-reference
Bug#489135: debian-policy: how to document a repackaged .orig.tar.gz
Bug reassigned from package `debian-policy' to `developers-reference'.
> severity 489135 normal
Unknown command or malformed arguments to comma
reassign 489135 developers-reference
severity 489135 normal
retitle 489135 developers-reference: uses debian-policy style wording
stop
In my opinion developers-reference should not use must/should/may
wording, because this makes readers confuse developers-reference with
debian-policy.
For examp
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
reassign 426877 debian-policy 3.8.0.1
retitle 426877 Clarify what "sensible behaviour" is for init scripts
thanks
Ok, this confirms my initial feeling. Changing this in dpkg would require
a wide-scale testing and much effort for little gains since the p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Reply-To:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> reassign 426877 debian-policy 3.8.0.1
Bug#426877: dpkg: Option "--oknodo" should be the default behavi
Proud to be an American http://68.58.112.130/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 04 Jul 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Here's a try (against current master branch):
> diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
> index c9bd84f..772afce 100644
> --- a/policy.sgml
> +++ b/policy.sgml
> @@ -5946,9 +5946,11 @@ rmdir /usr/local/share/emacs 2>/dev/null || true
> The init
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
> index c9bd84f..772afce 100644
> --- a/policy.sgml
> +++ b/policy.sgml
> @@ -5946,9 +5946,11 @@ rmdir /usr/local/share/emacs 2>/dev/null || true
> The init.d scripts must ensure that they will
>
El Viernes, 4 de Julio de 2008, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
> Ok, this confirms my initial feeling. Changing this in dpkg would require
> a wide-scale testing and much effort for little gains since the policy
> already require packages to behave sensibly.
It seems that some services return 0 and oth
On Fri, 04 Jul 2008, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> # lighttpd running:
> ~# /etc/init.d/lighttpd start ; echo $?
> * Starting web server lighttpd
> [fail]
> 1
[...]
> > Iñaki, if you ever encounter
> > bad init scripts, please report bugs against the offending packages.
>
> In the above case which
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 01:47:39 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I think being LSB compliant is good for Debian.
>
> The LSB init script specification *is a specification for the init scripts
> of LSB packages*. It has NOTHING to do with LSB compliance of LSB
> implementations. Debian is an
Steve Langasek wrote:
>> I'm reluctant to change the default behaviour of start-stop-daemon at this
>> point. What do other people think of making --oknodo the default behaviour
>> and adding a new option to force the current default behaviour (exit with
>> failure if nothing had to be done)?
>
>
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 11:59:31AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> reassign 426877 debian-policy 3.8.0.1
> retitle 426877 Clarify what "sensible behaviour" is for init scripts
> thanks
> Ok, this confirms my initial feeling. Changing this in dpkg would require
> a wide-scale testing and much effo
13 matches
Mail list logo
