[no subject]

2003-08-25 Thread laspsystem.com
v Good morning sir With this letter, the L.A.S.P. System will inform you then we that we will be present to the Equipe' Hotels fair, from the 28 settmbre to 3 October at Parigi France in the stand N140 padiglione 4 corsia C. We expose the new system M.A.N.T.T.®. System of telescopic cov

Re: Bug#206928: LSB vs. Policy

2003-08-25 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 12:09:14PM +0200, Martin Godisch wrote: > > > > See subject. The init script should just be quiet, as other init > > > > scripts do. Instead, it says "...program not found". > > > > > > This is in compliance with the Linux Standard Base: > > > > > > In case of an error,

Bug#207132: debian-policy is missing gcc transition plans

2003-08-25 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.6.1.0 Severity: normal Hi, again someone asks for what to do about gcc 2.95->3.2 transition and the right place would be to point to the debian-policy package just as with the libc6 transition. Please include http://people.debian.org/~rmurray/c++transition.htm

Bug#207132: debian-policy is missing gcc transition plans

2003-08-25 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 10:41:46AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > Package: debian-policy > Version: 3.6.1.0 > Severity: normal > > again someone asks for what to do about gcc 2.95->3.2 transition and > the right place would be to point to the debian-policy package just as > with the libc6 transi

Processed: Proposals should be severity wishlist

2003-08-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 207132 wishlist Bug#207132: debian-policy is missing gcc transition plans Severity set to `wishlist'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bu

Bug#207132: debian-policy is missing gcc transition plans

2003-08-25 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 12:26:16PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > http://people.debian.org/~rmurray/c++transition.html > > Ps: you might want to consider retiring the libc6 transition document. > I'd rather if we dropped all such transitional issues from the Policy > manual. They're just bother an