Bug#178809: rules for Build-Depends-Indep satisfaction make no sense

2003-02-11 Thread James Troup
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > In that case, the buildds are broken: they don't install > > Build-Depends-Indep, even though they do invoke the clean and build > > targets of debian/rules (through dpkg-buildpackage). See > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=freesci&ver=0.3.4

Re: Question regarding policy (11.2)

2003-02-11 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Although I thought static libs might be useless for a second, I remembered that I actually do use static libs... > > It's not about disks so much as bandwidth. Disk may be cheap, but > > bandwidth isn't, at lesast not universally. I've also no idea who > > would want or need static libraries in