On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 07:30:33PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 01:08:45PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > Still speaking as a user, I'm not annoyed by a dotfile per program I
> > use. I'm much more annoyed by all the useless dotfiles, created by
> > programs that I run once
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 04:52:46PM +0100, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> > > Still speaking as a user, I'm not annoyed by a dotfile per program I
> > > use. I'm much more annoyed by all the useless dotfiles, created by
> > > programs that I run once, and never again, without even having saved a
> > > configur
> > It caches information to reduce startup times. dlopen() 10 *.so files
> > and doing various function calls to get all the info stored in that file
> > takes some time ...
>
> Yeah but I _don't_ _need_ _no_ _libquicktime_ _codecs_, so avoiding to waste
> all that time can be done simply by not
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 05:11:11PM +0100, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> > > It caches information to reduce startup times. dlopen() 10 *.so files
> > > and doing various function calls to get all the info stored in that file
> > > takes some time ...
> >
> > Yeah but I _don't_ _need_ _no_ _libquicktime_ _c
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 05:19:59PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 05:11:11PM +0100, Gerd Knorr wrote:
>
> > xawtv wants to know: when it creates all the windows and widgets at
> > startup time. There is a menu with the available codecs in the
> > record dialog ...
>
> Yeah,
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 01:00:19AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> Seriously, I didn't mean it that way; I just meant that I think everyone
> has generally accepted that UTF-8 is the way of the future; we're just
> debating when, where, and how.
I want to challenge the "everyone" in your sent
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 13:28, Jochen Voss wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 01:00:19AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> > Seriously, I didn't mean it that way; I just meant that I think everyone
> > has generally accepted that UTF-8 is the way of the future; we're just
> > debating when, whe
>I agree that it would be a good idea to store filenames as UTF-8
>in the filesystem. But I (being a part of "everyone") do not
>agree, that we should even try to switch every terminal in the
>world to UTF-8. We do need conversion of file names somewhere
>between the filesystem level and output.
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 20:57, David Starner wrote:
> A Posix filename is a null terminated byte string (sans '/'). Any
> widescale conversion is going to cause aliasing issues and other
> bugs, whether or not we stay Posix compatible.
> Just as important, conversion is not an issue for debian-pol
At 10:29 PM 1/9/2003 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
Right. Did the people on that list come up with any general plan for
how GNU/Linux vendors should transition?
Not anything written up that I know of. Debian-i18n has a large cross
membership, which was part of the reason this should be on debian
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 23:05, David Starner wrote:
> Not anything written up that I know of. Debian-i18n has a large cross
> membership, which was part of the reason this should be on debian-i18n.
Ok, if people want to move this discussion that's fine by me.
> >Are you saying that programs should
11 matches
Mail list logo
