AALWAY, TOUT LE LOGICIEL POUR LA COMMUNAUTE DU NET
LA LETTRE D'INFO du 21 novembre 2001
http://www.aalway.net/index_assur201101.php
Bonjour,
* 30% de remise sur tous nos logi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 120418 [PROPOSAL] CPU extension code
Bug#120418: cc: Michel LESPINASSE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Robert Stone <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>,Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>,Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,[EMAIL PROT
Is it acceptable to put source files for non-C-related languages
(such as Python, Perl, Ada, Java, and so on) in subdirectories
under /usr/include?
It does make some sense, but I don't like this idea. Policy doesn't
seem to cover this issue.
--
Florian Weimer[EMAIL PROTECTED
Previously Florian Weimer wrote:
> Is it acceptable to put source files for non-C-related languages
> (such as Python, Perl, Ada, Java, and so on) in subdirectories
> under /usr/include?
I'ld say no. Those languages don't use include files, they use
libraries.
Wichert.
--
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 11:18:20AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Is it acceptable to put source files for non-C-related languages
> (such as Python, Perl, Ada, Java, and so on) in subdirectories
> under /usr/include?
What are "source files" in this context? Note that /usr/include is
generally no
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 11:18:20AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Is it acceptable to put source files for non-C-related languages
> > (such as Python, Perl, Ada, Java, and so on) in subdirectories
> > under /usr/include?
>
> What are "source files" i
Hi all,
OK, there wasn't very much response from the HTTP daemon maintainers to
either me or this list (actually none at all)...
But there's at least on package (caudium) which already Provides:
httpd-cgi...
How should I proceed now?
File bugs against the other HTTPds? Make an official policy-pr
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Previously Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Is it acceptable to put source files for non-C-related languages
> > (such as Python, Perl, Ada, Java, and so on) in subdirectories
> > under /usr/include?
>
> I'ld say no. Those languages don't use include files,
Previously Florian Weimer wrote:
> What about the Ada case? GNAT pretty much requires that complete
> source code is present for all compilation units at compilation (and
> binding/linking) time. And package specs are very similar to C header
> files, at least with the GNAT compilation model.
Qu
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 12:06:24PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 11:18:20AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > Is it acceptable to put source files for non-C-related languages
> > > (such as Python, Perl, Ada, Java, and so on
Title: ìì´ ë°°ì°ë ì¦ê±°ìê³¼ 기ì¨ì´ ê°ë¬¼ì²ë¼ í르ë íë³µí SES 보기!
ìì´ ë°°ì°ë ì¦ê±°ìê³¼ 기ì¨ì´ ê°ë¬¼ì²ë¼ í르ë íë³µí
SES 보기!
SESë 24ìê° Tutorì í¨ê» ìííë 기ìì ìì´ì°ìì
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 12:38:55PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Quoting from section 4.3 of the FHS 2.1:
Which in turn suggests the proper solution: ask on the FHS lists, and
maybe on ada/gnat developer lists. Try to find an answer that applies
to everyone, not just to Debian, and I suspect
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Chris Waters wrote:
> > How about using /usr/share/ada instead?
>
> Speaking for myself, yuck! I'd much prefer to use /usr/include for
> this. But I'm not an ada expert, and I don't know what the historical
> precedent (if any) is. Maybe we should find out how it's _suppos
13 matches
Mail list logo
