On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 08:34:43PM -0700, Seth Arnold wrote:
> proposals. (Though in the section about seconding, it makes especial
> reference to "registered Debian developers". Perhaps for the purposes of
> getting this bug taken care of, simply being An Interested User counts
> for proposals. If
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:52:10AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > Wichert, I think "Geez, again?" is the incorrect response to Daniel's
> > > mail. Bugs #42399 and #65345 against debian-policy have been outstanding
> > > for 1 year and 268 days and 322 days. #65345 even has a patch against
> > >
Josip Rodin wrote:
>Nobody explicitely said they second it, and nobody explicitely said they
>object.
>
>Several people (mostly maintainers of packages against which lintian barfs
>due to this) have said they would like this change in Policy, but not
>"officially", even though I've aske
(missed this mail in my enormous inbox, sorry :)
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 08:34:43PM -0700, Seth Arnold wrote:
> > They need to be exempt from the rule for shlibs file, too.
> >
> > See my attempt in #66023...
>
> Aye, too true. It may be easier for the proposal to not decide the paths
> involve
I'm sending this to the bug address so it is recorded :o)
- Forwarded message from Oliver Elphick -
Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 13:50:15 +0200
X-URL: http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
To: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-policy@lists.debian.or
- Forwarded message from Oliver Elphick -
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 12:48:12 +0100
From: "Oliver Elphick"
Subject: Re: Old proposals again (Re: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.)
To: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-policy@lists.debian.org
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy
Module name:debian-policy
Changes by: jdg Fri Apr 27 07:53:26 PDT 2001
Modified files:
. : policy.sgml
Log message:
* Make # in closes: regexp optional, as in latest dpkg-dev
debian-policy@lists.debian.org wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvs/debian-policy
> Module name: debian-policy
> Changes by: jdg Fri Apr 27 07:53:26 PDT 2001
>
> Modified files:
> . : policy.sgml
>
> Log message:
> * Make # in closes: regexp optional, as in latest dpkg-dev
So
>
> I'd prefer if people seconded the diff in #66023 :) and then we can refine
> that stuff further if necessary.
>
agreed, let's get this solved.
(Seconded).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can any developer second policy proposals? If so, I second this one too...
(I have a package libwine that puts dynamically-loaded stuff into
/usr/lib/wine)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75
Greetings; I am pleased that Josip's proposal has received several
seconds. (Though I don't think many were signed -- I am fairly certain
that they do need to be signed to count!)
Since my goal is to get this thing taken care of as easily as possible,
I am retracting both my policy proposals so th
Steve Greenland wrote:
> *Nobody* can keep up with joeyh. :-)
You may find it easier now that I'm stuck behind this modem.
--
see shy jo
Steve Greenland wrote:
> Ain't gonna happen. It's been discussed before. The problem is that most
> debhelper Build-Depends actually need to be versioned[1], which won't
> work with build-essential.
>
> [1] I personally am not convinced this is the case (simply expecting
> that the build-essentials
Colin Watson wrote:
> - /usr/share/man).
> + /usr/share/man). If you do not create any links
> + (whether symlinks, hard links, or .so directives) in the
> + filesystem to the alternate names of the manpage, then you
> + should not rely on man finding your manpage
> +
14 matches
Mail list logo
