On 20010416T104914+0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Did the ftpadmins ever consider the possibility of running lintian on
> packages before allowing them into unstable?
I believe that all of us ftpmasters run lintian on new packages as part
of our set of new package checks. The results are then consi
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 06:03:49PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Julian> - there's no longer a suggestion of using policy as anything other
> Julian> than a set of guidelines
>
> Is that really the case? I certainly do not find that I treat
> Policy as a guideline, to be followed or
Installing:
fhs.txt byhand
fhs-2.1.html.tar.gz byhand
policy.txt.gz byhand
menu-policy.txt.gz byhand
mime-policy.txt.gz byhand
virtual-package-names-list.txt byhand
policy.pdf.gz byhand
policy.html.tar.gz byhand
libc6-migration.txt byhand
debian-policy_3.5.3.0_all.deb
to pool/main/d/debian-polic
tag 86507 + fixed
tag 87007 + fixed
tag 87711 + fixed
tag 87828 + fixed
tag 88651 + fixed
tag 88788 + fixed
tag 91276 + fixed
tag 93047 + fixed
tag 93620 + fixed
tag 93705 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 86507 + fixed
Bug#86507: recommends removed package
Bug#93620: ftp.debian.org: debian-policy recommends a nonexistent package
Bug#93705: packaging-manual not available in sid
Tags added: fixed
> tag 87007 + fixed
Bug#87007: [TYPO] policy: ch sect 2
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 06:03:49PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Julian" == Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Julian> - there's no longer a suggestion of using policy as anything other
> Julian> than a set of guidelines
> Is that really the case? I certainly do not find th
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy
Module name:debian-policy
Changes by: jdg Wed Apr 18 09:15:14 PDT 2001
Modified files:
. : policy.sgml
debian : rules
Log message:
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:24:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bugs closed: debian-policy_3.5.3.0_i386.changes INSTALLED
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:24:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bugs closed: debian-policy_3.5.3.0_i386.changes INSTALLED
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:24:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bugs closed: debian-policy_3.5.3.0_i386.changes INSTALLED
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:24:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bugs closed: debian-policy_3.5.3.0_i386.changes INSTALLED
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:24:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bugs closed: debian-policy_3.5.3.0_i386.changes INSTALLED
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:24:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bugs closed: debian-policy_3.5.3.0_i386.changes INSTALLED
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:24:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bugs closed: debian-policy_3.5.3.0_i386.changes INSTALLED
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:24:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bugs closed: debian-policy_3.5.3.0_i386.changes INSTALLED
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:24:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bugs closed: debian-policy_3.5.3.0_i386.changes INSTALLED
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:24:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bugs closed: debian-policy_3.5.3.0_i386.changes INSTALLED
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
17 matches
Mail list logo
