On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 10:56:27PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Adam" == Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Adam> I am trying to make a source package of daemontools by Dan
> Adam> Bernstein. Since there is no license for distributing the
> Adam> source, I have made my source
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.1.1.1
Severity: wishlist
The package includes the FHS in ps, dvi and txt. Please consider
adding the HTML version as well. Thanks.
Greetings
Marc
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux paola 2.2.18 #1 Tue Dec 12 11:54:38 CET 2
>>"Adam" == Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Uhh, why are there no redistribution terms on your package?
>> (and since you do not in any way, shape, or form include Dan's
>> code, your code is all that is in the package)
Adam> There aren't any. The problem is that the "source pac
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 04:46:37PM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote:
> I am trying to make a source package of daemontools by Dan Bernstein. Since
> there is no license for distributing the source, I have made my source
> package an installer package. The only problem I have is the Debian .diff
Hello A
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:15:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is it policy conform to have a package (or packages depending on each
> other) installing binaries in /usr/bin/ _and_ providing syslinks to
> /usr/local/bin/ ?
I believe Dan has indicated that much in e-mails, but I don't know if
>>"pape" == pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
pape> Is it policy conform to have a package (or packages depending on each
pape> other) installing binaries in /usr/bin/ _and_ providing syslinks to
pape> /usr/local/bin/ ?
No.
manoj
--
When told he was making more per year than
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 03:15:14AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Oh, for heavens sake. Start a fresh directory, called
> foo-installer. Create a ./debian directory. create a script that
> called create-foo-pkg-now (or something you like better); Also create
> ./debis-dir-for-foo/debia
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> >>"Jakob" == Jakob Bøhm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jakob> 2. Mechanical filtering on specific common issues including
> Jakob> the meta-issue "other problems" becomes possible, e.g. when
> Jakob> creating cd-roms or mirrors, or when setting up a
> Jakob> fool
Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
>
> > Okay, hopefully the final language change:
> >
> > Proposal is to change section 2.1.5 of the Debian policy to say:
> >
> >Non-free programs with cryptographic program code must be stored on
> >the "non-us" server because of export restrictions of the U.S.
>>"Jakob" == Jakob Bøhm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jakob> I propose changing end to:
Jakob> because of export, import and possession restrictions of various
Jakob> countries (not limited to the USA).
This is wrong. If there is no problem exporting it from the
US, it shall be put on
>>"Jakob" == Jakob Bøhm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jakob> What I was proposing was, that package maintainers would
Jakob> (by some future policy change not directly related to non-us)
Frankly, I would be opposed to such a policy mod. I am not
convinced that such granularity does not o
11 matches
Mail list logo
